Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39057725›Full record

ReviewJournal of imaging2024

What to Expect (and What Not) from Dual-Energy CT Imaging Now and in the Future?

Roberto García-Figueiras, Laura Oleaga, Jordi Broncano, Gonzalo Tardáguila, Gabriel Fernández-Pérez, Eliseo Vañó, Eloísa Santos-Armentia, Ramiro Méndez, Antonio Luna, Sandra Baleato-González

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of imaging, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Quantitative parameters of dual-layer spectral CT for differentiating metastatic and non-metastatic lymph nodes in colorectal cancer.Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2026
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Roberto García-FigueirasDepartment of Radiology, Hospital Clínico Universitario de Santiago, Choupana, 15706 Santiago de Compostela, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-9494-9783
Laura OleagaDepartment of Radiology, Hospital Clinic, C. de Villarroel, 170, 08036 Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-9702-0451
Jordi BroncanoHT Médica, 14012 Córdoba, Spain.
Gonzalo TardáguilaDepartment of Radiology, Hospital Ribera Povisa, Rúa de Salamanca, 5, Vigo, 36211 Pontevedra, Spain.
Gabriel Fernández-PérezGrupo Recoletas, 47007 Valladolid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-2732-6161
Eliseo VañóDepartment of Radiology, Hospital Universitario Nuestra Señora, del Rosario, C. del Príncipe de Vergara, 53, 28006 Madrid, Spain.
Eloísa Santos-ArmentiaDepartment of Radiology, Hospital Ribera Povisa, Rúa de Salamanca, 5, Vigo, 36211 Pontevedra, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-1999-141X
Ramiro MéndezDepartment of Radiology, Hospital Universitario Nuestra Señora, del Rosario, C. del Príncipe de Vergara, 53, 28006 Madrid, Spain.
Antonio LunaHT Médica, 14012 Córdoba, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-9358-3396
Sandra Baleato-GonzálezDepartment of Radiology, Hospital Clínico Universitario de Santiago, Choupana, 15706 Santiago de Compostela, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-1369-2988

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dual-energy CT (DECT) imaging has broadened the potential of CT imaging by offering multiple postprocessing datasets with a single acquisition at more than one energy level. DECT shows profound capabilities to improve diagnosis based on its superior material differentiation and its quantitative value. However, the potential of dual-energy imaging remains relatively untapped, possibly due to its intricate workflow and the intrinsic technical limitations of DECT. Knowing the clinical advantages of dual-energy imaging and recognizing its limitations and pitfalls is necessary for an appropriate clinical use. The aims of this paper are to review the physical and technical bases of DECT acquisition and analysis, to discuss the advantages and limitations of DECT in different clinical scenarios, to review the technical constraints in material labeling and quantification, and to evaluate the cutting-edge applications of DECT imaging, including artificial intelligence, qualitative and quantitative imaging biomarkers, and DECT-derived radiomics and radiogenomics.

Indexed as

computed tomographydual-energy CTiodine mapmaterial

Identifiers

PMID39057725
PMCPMC11278514

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.