Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39057723›Full record

ArticleJournal of imaging2024

Efficient Wheat Head Segmentation with Minimal Annotation: A Generative Approach.

Jaden Myers, Keyhan Najafian, Farhad Maleki, Katie Ovens

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of imaging, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jaden MyersDepartment of Computer Science, University of Calgary, 2500 University Drive NW, Calgary, AB T2N 1N4, Canada.
Keyhan NajafianDepartment of Computer Science, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK S7N 5A2, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-3050-8107
Farhad MalekiDepartment of Computer Science, University of Calgary, 2500 University Drive NW, Calgary, AB T2N 1N4, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-5673-8210
Katie OvensDepartment of Computer Science, University of Calgary, 2500 University Drive NW, Calgary, AB T2N 1N4, Canada.

Funding

Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council RGPIN-2023-04245
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Deep learning models have been used for a variety of image processing tasks. However, most of these models are developed through supervised learning approaches, which rely heavily on the availability of large-scale annotated datasets. Developing such datasets is tedious and expensive. In the absence of an annotated dataset, synthetic data can be used for model development; however, due to the substantial differences between simulated and real data, a phenomenon referred to as domain gap, the resulting models often underperform when applied to real data. In this research, we aim to address this challenge by first computationally simulating a large-scale annotated dataset and then using a generative adversarial network (GAN) to fill the gap between simulated and real images. This approach results in a synthetic dataset that can be effectively utilized to train a deep-learning model. Using this approach, we developed a realistic annotated synthetic dataset for wheat head segmentation. This dataset was then used to develop a deep-learning model for semantic segmentation. The resulting model achieved a Dice score of 83.4% on an internal dataset and Dice scores of 79.6% and 83.6% on two external datasets from the Global Wheat Head Detection datasets. While we proposed this approach in the context of wheat head segmentation, it can be generalized to other crop types or, more broadly, to images with dense, repeated patterns such as those found in cellular imagery.

Indexed as

data synthesisdeep learninggenerative adversarial networkssegmentation

Identifiers

PMID39057723
PMCPMC11278364

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.