Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39057688›Full record

ReviewMetabolites2024

Current State, Challenges, and Opportunities in Genome-Scale Resource Allocation Models: A Mathematical Perspective.

Wheaton L Schroeder, Patrick F Suthers, Thomas C Willis, Eric J Mooney, Costas D Maranas

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Metabolites, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Metabolic modeling of host-microbe interactions.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Wheaton L SchroederDepartment of Chemical Engineering, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802, USA.
Patrick F SuthersDepartment of Chemical Engineering, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5560-9986
Thomas C WillisDepartment of Chemical Engineering, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802, USA.
Eric J MooneyDOE Center for Advanced Bioenergy and Bioproducts Innovation, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9879-5205
Costas D MaranasDepartment of Chemical Engineering, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802, USA.

Funding

Office of Science DE-SC0018420Office of Science ERKP886
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Stoichiometric genome-scale metabolic models (generally abbreviated GSM, GSMM, or GEM) have had many applications in exploring phenotypes and guiding metabolic engineering interventions. Nevertheless, these models and predictions thereof can become limited as they do not directly account for protein cost, enzyme kinetics, and cell surface or volume proteome limitations. Lack of such mechanistic detail could lead to overly optimistic predictions and engineered strains. Initial efforts to correct these deficiencies were by the application of precursor tools for GSMs, such as flux balance analysis with molecular crowding. In the past decade, several frameworks have been introduced to incorporate proteome-related limitations using a genome-scale stoichiometric model as the reconstruction basis, which herein are called resource allocation models (RAMs). This review provides a broad overview of representative or commonly used existing RAM frameworks. This review discusses increasingly complex models, beginning with stoichiometric models to precursor to RAM frameworks to existing RAM frameworks. RAM frameworks are broadly divided into two categories: coarse-grained and fine-grained, with different strengths and challenges. Discussion includes pinpointing their utility, data needs, highlighting framework strengths and limitations, and appropriateness to various research endeavors, largely through contrasting their mathematical frameworks. Finally, promising future applications of RAMs are discussed.

Indexed as

computational biologygenome-scale modelingsystems biology

Identifiers

PMID39057688
PMCPMC11278519

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.