ReviewMetabolites2024
Current State, Challenges, and Opportunities in Genome-Scale Resource Allocation Models: A Mathematical Perspective.
Review in Metabolites, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Dynamical Systems-Constrained Metabolic Modeling Enables Forecasting of Host-Microbiome Dynamics.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Understanding plant resilience by putting photosynthesis and photorespiration in the metabolic context.Planta · 2026Review
- Computational and multi-omics systems biology for precision microbiome therapeutics.Frontiers in microbiomes · 2026Review
- A voyage of reprogrammable metabolic bioengineering reshapes plant defense: from editing tools to synthetic systems.Frontiers in plant science · 2026Review
- The Dawn of High-Throughput and Genome-Scale Kinetic Modeling: Recent Advances and Future Directions.ACS synthetic biology · 2025Review
- Enzyme-constrained metabolic model ofmSystems · 2025Article
- New insights in metabolism modelling to decipher plant-microbe interactions.The New phytologist · 2025Review
- Enhancing genome-scale metabolic models with kinetic data: resolving growth and citramalate production trade-offs inBioinformatics advances · 2025Article
- Metabolic modeling of host-microbe interactions.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Stoichiometric genome-scale metabolic models (generally abbreviated GSM, GSMM, or GEM) have had many applications in exploring phenotypes and guiding metabolic engineering interventions. Nevertheless, these models and predictions thereof can become limited as they do not directly account for protein cost, enzyme kinetics, and cell surface or volume proteome limitations. Lack of such mechanistic detail could lead to overly optimistic predictions and engineered strains. Initial efforts to correct these deficiencies were by the application of precursor tools for GSMs, such as flux balance analysis with molecular crowding. In the past decade, several frameworks have been introduced to incorporate proteome-related limitations using a genome-scale stoichiometric model as the reconstruction basis, which herein are called resource allocation models (RAMs). This review provides a broad overview of representative or commonly used existing RAM frameworks. This review discusses increasingly complex models, beginning with stoichiometric models to precursor to RAM frameworks to existing RAM frameworks. RAM frameworks are broadly divided into two categories: coarse-grained and fine-grained, with different strengths and challenges. Discussion includes pinpointing their utility, data needs, highlighting framework strengths and limitations, and appropriateness to various research endeavors, largely through contrasting their mathematical frameworks. Finally, promising future applications of RAMs are discussed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.