ArticleJournal of functional biomaterials2024
Fracture Resistance of Posterior Milled Nanoceramic Crowns after Thermomechanical Aging.
Article in Journal of functional biomaterials, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Marginal and Internal Fit, Surface Roughness and Fracture Resistance of Hybrid Dental Crown Materials Fabricated With Milling and 3D-Printing Systems: An In Vitro Study.Australian dental journal · 2026Article
- Impact of Thermocycling and Artificial Aging on the Flexural Strength and Fracture Resistance of CAD/CAM Dental Ceramics: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Dentistry journal · 2026Review
- Fracture Strength of CAD/CAM Endocrown and Post-Core Restorations with Fiber Strip Reinforcement in Mandibular Premolars.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2026Article
- Influence of Cusp Coverage Design and Hybrid Resin-Ceramic Materials on the Biomechanical Performance of Partial Coverage Restorations.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Fracture resistance is an important parameter used to predict the performance of indirect dental restorations. The purpose of this in vitro study was to assess the fracture load of posterior milled nanoceramic crowns, in comparison with the lithium disilicate crowns, after fatigue loading, for two different restoration occlusal thicknesses. Forty test metal dies were fabricated by duplicating a master metal model consisting of an anatomic abutment preparation of the maxillary first premolar for a single crown. The dies were divided into two groups of 20 each for the fabrication of nanoceramic (Lava Ultimate) and lithium disilicate (IPS e.max CAD) single crowns. Each material group was further divided into two sub-groups of 10 dies each, based on crown occlusal thickness, of 0.5-mm and 0.75-mm (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.