Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39057032›Full record

ReviewCurrent issues in molecular biology2024

Translation of Epigenetics in Cell-Free DNA Liquid Biopsy Technology and Precision Oncology.

Wan Ying Tan, Snigdha Nagabhyrava, Olivia Ang-Olson, Paromita Das, Luisa Ladel, Bethsebie Sailo, Linda He, Anup Sharma, Nita Ahuja

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current issues in molecular biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Detection ofOncology research · 2026
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Epigenetic mechanisms in aneurysm formation, growth, and rupture: A systematic review.Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences · 2025
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Wan Ying TanDepartment of Surgery, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06520-8000, USA.
Snigdha NagabhyravaDepartment of Internal Medicine, Norwalk Hospital, Norwalk, CT 06850, USA.
Olivia Ang-OlsonDepartment of Surgery, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06520-8000, USA.ORCID 0009-0000-6840-8748
Paromita DasDepartment of Surgery, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06520-8000, USA.
Luisa LadelDepartment of Surgery, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06520-8000, USA.
Bethsebie SailoDepartment of Surgery, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06520-8000, USA.
Linda HeDepartment of Surgery, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06520-8000, USA.
Anup SharmaDepartment of Surgery, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06520-8000, USA.
Nita AhujaDepartment of Surgery, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06520-8000, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Technological advancements in cell-free DNA (cfDNA) liquid biopsy have triggered exponential growth in numerous clinical applications. While cfDNA-based liquid biopsy has made significant strides in personalizing cancer treatment, the exploration and translation of epigenetics in liquid biopsy to clinical practice is still nascent. This comprehensive review seeks to provide a broad yet in-depth narrative of the present status of epigenetics in cfDNA liquid biopsy and its associated challenges. It highlights the potential of epigenetics in cfDNA liquid biopsy technologies with the hopes of enhancing its clinical translation. The momentum of cfDNA liquid biopsy technologies in recent years has propelled epigenetics to the forefront of molecular biology. We have only begun to reveal the true potential of epigenetics in both our understanding of disease and leveraging epigenetics in the diagnostic and therapeutic domains. Recent clinical applications of epigenetics-based cfDNA liquid biopsy revolve around DNA methylation in screening and early cancer detection, leading to the development of multi-cancer early detection tests and the capability to pinpoint tissues of origin. The clinical application of epigenetics in cfDNA liquid biopsy in minimal residual disease, monitoring, and surveillance are at their initial stages. A notable advancement in fragmentation patterns analysis has created a new avenue for epigenetic biomarkers. However, the widespread application of cfDNA liquid biopsy has many challenges, including biomarker sensitivity, specificity, logistics including infrastructure and personnel, data processing, handling, results interpretation, accessibility, and cost effectiveness. Exploring and translating epigenetics in cfDNA liquid biopsy technology can transform our understanding and perception of cancer prevention and management. cfDNA liquid biopsy has great potential in precision oncology to revolutionize conventional ways of early cancer detection, monitoring residual disease, treatment response, surveillance, and drug development. Adapting the implementation of liquid biopsy workflow to the local policy worldwide and developing point-of-care testing holds great potential to overcome global cancer disparity and improve cancer outcomes.

Indexed as

cancer disparitycancer screeningcell-free DNAchromatin remodelingcirculating tumor DNADNA methylationearly cancer detectionepigenetic drugsepigeneticsepigenomicsfragmentomicshistone modificationliquid biopsynucleosome positioningpersonalized medicineprecision oncologytargeted therapytranslational medicine

Identifiers

PMID39057032
PMCPMC11276574

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.