Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39057024›Full record

ArticleCurrent issues in molecular biology2024

Safety of Exposure to 0.2 T and 4 Hz Rotating Magnetic Field: A Ten-Month Study on C57BL/6 Mice.

Hua Yang, Yu Han, Cai Zhou, Shenglan Nie, Mengqing Li, Qinyao Yu, Yunpeng Wei, Xiaomei Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current issues in molecular biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Hua YangDepartment of Physiology, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Shenzhen University Medical School, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen 518055, China.
Yu HanDepartment of Physiology, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Shenzhen University Medical School, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen 518055, China.
Cai ZhouDepartment of Physiology, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Shenzhen University Medical School, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen 518055, China.
Shenglan NieDepartment of Physiology, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Shenzhen University Medical School, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen 518055, China.
Mengqing LiDepartment of Physiology, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Shenzhen University Medical School, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen 518055, China.
Qinyao YuSchool of Pharmacy, Shenzhen University Medical School, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen 518055, China.
Yunpeng WeiDepartment of Physiology, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Shenzhen University Medical School, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen 518055, China.
Xiaomei WangDepartment of Physiology, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Shenzhen University Medical School, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen 518055, China.ORCID 0000-0003-1618-7984

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 81772002Shenzhen Science Technology and Innovation Commission JCYJ20170818092553608Shenzhen Science Technology and Innovation Commission JCYJ20230808104859039
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Amidst the burgeoning interest in rotating magnetic fields (RMF) within biological research, there remains a notable gap in the scientific evidence concerning the long-term safety of RMF. Thus, this study aimed to investigate the safety of protracted exposure to a 0.2 T, 4 Hz RMF over 10 months in mice. Two-month-old female C57BL/6 mice were randomly allocated to either the RMF group (exposed to 0.2 T, 4 Hz real RMF) or the SHAM group (exposed to 0 T, 4 Hz sham RMF). Throughout the experiment, the murine weekly body weights were recorded, and their behavioral traits were assessed via open field tests. In the final month, a comprehensive evaluation of the murine overall health was conducted, encompassing analyses of blood parameters, histomorphological examination of major organs, and skeletal assessments using X-ray and micro-CT imaging. The murine immune system and lipid metabolism were evaluated through immunochip analysis and metabolomics. Notably, no discernible adverse effects with RMF exposure were observed. Murine body weight, locomotor behavior, organ histomorphology, and skeletal health remained unaffected by RMF. Blood analysis revealed subtle changes in hormone and lipid levels between the SHAM and RMF groups, yet these differences did not reach statistical significance. Moreover, RMF led to elevated serum interleukin-28 (IL-28) levels, albeit within the normal range, and modest alterations in serum lipid metabolites. Conclusively, mice exposed to the 0.2 T, 4 Hz RMF for 10 months displayed no significant signs of chronic toxicity, indicating its potential clinical application as a physical therapy.

Indexed as

bloodchronic toxicityhistomorphological examinationmicerotating magnetic fieldskeletal system

Identifiers

PMID39057024
PMCPMC11275342

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.