Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39057008›Full record

ArticleDentistry journal2024

Insights into the Cytotoxicity and Irritant Potential of Chlorhexidine Digluconate: An In Vitro and In Ovo Safety Screening.

Stefania Dinu, Anamaria Matichescu, Roxana Buzatu, Iasmina Marcovici, Andreea Geamantan-Sirbu, Alexandra Denisa Semenescu, Remus Christian Bratu, Dana-Cristina Bratu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Dentistry journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Rapid Bactericidal Activity ofMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  12. Assessment of the biosafety profile ofWorld journal of cardiology · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Stefania DinuDepartment of Pedodontics, Faculty of Dental Medicine, "Victor Babeș" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, No. 9, Revolutiei 1989 Bv., 300041 Timisoara, Romania.ORCID 0000-0002-4351-7726
Anamaria MatichescuDepartment of Preventive, Community Dentistry and Oral Health, Translational and Experimental Clinical Research Centre in Oral Health, University of Medicine and Pharmacy "Victor Babeș", 300040 Timisoara, Romania.ORCID 0000-0002-5247-9821
Roxana BuzatuDepartment of Dental Aesthetics, Faculty of Dental Medicine, "Victor Babeș" University of Medicine and Pharmacy Timisoara, Revolutiei Boulevard 9, 300041 Timisoara, Romania.ORCID 0000-0003-0653-0996
Iasmina MarcoviciFaculty of Pharmacy, "Victor Babes" University of Medicine and Pharmacy Timisoara, Eftimie Murgu Square No. 2, 300041 Timisoara, Romania.
Andreea Geamantan-SirbuFaculty of Pharmacy, "Victor Babes" University of Medicine and Pharmacy Timisoara, Eftimie Murgu Square No. 2, 300041 Timisoara, Romania.
Alexandra Denisa SemenescuFaculty of Pharmacy, "Victor Babes" University of Medicine and Pharmacy Timisoara, Eftimie Murgu Square No. 2, 300041 Timisoara, Romania.ORCID 0000-0001-7718-4168
Remus Christian BratuFaculty of Dental Medicine, "Victor Babeș" University of Medicine and Pharmacy Timișoara, 2 Eftimie Murgu Square, 300041 Timișoara, Romania.
Dana-Cristina BratuDepartment of Orthodontics II, Faculty of Dental Medicine, "Victor Babeș" University of Medicine and Pharmacy Timișoara, 2 Eftimie Murgu Square, 300041 Timișoara, Romania.ORCID 0000-0002-2401-690X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chlorhexidine (CHX) represents one of the most commonly used antiseptics in dentistry and other medical-pharmaceutical fields due to its broad-spectrum antimicrobial activity. However, the potential toxic events arising from its common use in practice has become a subject of increasing concern. Thus, the present study was designed to investigate the potential toxicity of CHX digluconate at concentrations covering its antibacterial properties (0.0002-0.2%) in HGF primary gingival fibroblasts, HaCaT immortalized human keratinocytes, and JB6 Cl 41-5a epidermal cells, as well as its irritant action in ovo. Our results indicate that CHX exerted a concentration- and time-dependent cytotoxicity in all cell lines, which was evidenced by the reduction in cell viability, number, and confluence, damaged cell membrane integrity, impaired cell morphology, and specific apoptotic nuclear shape. The highest cytotoxicity was caused by CHX digluconate 0.02% and 0.2%, concentrations, at which an irritant effect on the chorioallantoic membrane was also observed. The novel findings revealed in this research contribute to the overall safety profile of CHX and stand as a basis for further investigations in this regard.

Indexed as

chlorhexidine digluconatecutaneous cellscytotoxicitydentistrygingival fibroblastsirritant potentialsafety screening

Identifiers

PMID39057008
PMCPMC11276539

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.