Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39056986›Full record

ArticleDentistry journal2024

Implementation of Patient-Individualized 3D-Printed Models in Undergraduate Students' Education for Various Prosthetic Treatments: A Cross-Sectional Survey Study.

Andrea Klink, Fabian Engelskirchen, Pablo Kaucher-Fernandez, Fabian Huettig, Ariadne Roehler

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Dentistry journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. 3D Printing in Dental Education: A Scoping Review.Medical principles and practice : international journal of the Kuwait University, Health Science Centre · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Andrea KlinkDepartment of Prosthodontics, Center for Dentistry, Oral Medicine and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Hospital Tuebingen, 72076 Tübingen, Germany.
Fabian EngelskirchenDepartment of Prosthodontics, Center for Dentistry, Oral Medicine and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Hospital Tuebingen, 72076 Tübingen, Germany.
Pablo Kaucher-FernandezDepartment of Prosthodontics, Center for Dentistry, Oral Medicine and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Hospital Tuebingen, 72076 Tübingen, Germany.
Fabian HuettigDepartment of Prosthodontics, Center for Dentistry, Oral Medicine and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Hospital Tuebingen, 72076 Tübingen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-7253-5923
Ariadne RoehlerDepartment of Medical Materials Science and Technology, Institute for Biomedical Engineering, University Hospital Tuebingen, 72076 Tübingen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-2824-6761

Funding

Medical Faculty of the University of Tuebingen F7363036
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDue to rapid changes in dental practice, digital technologies have become prominent in undergraduate dental education at German universities in recent years. This shift has prompted a re-evaluation of content as well as teaching methods, particularly in courses where students are prepared for patient treatment. Traditional training on standardized models with resin teeth cannot cover the complexity of individual dental arch configuration encountered in patient situations. This study explores the use of 3D printing technology to create individualized models for prosthetic treatment simulations, aiming to evaluate students' feedback towards their experience with this training setting.

methodsFirst, the study describes the design and fabrication of individualized models with exchangeable teeth based on intraoral scans, mounted on connected plates with distance holders that can be fixed to standard phantom heads. Second, students provided feedback through a questionnaire, assessing various aspects such as the effectiveness of the 3D-printed models compared to traditional frasaco models for preparation exercises.

resultsThe results indicated that the design of the realized models was feasible for preparation training (question no. 4: 93% positive rating) and showed positive perceptions of the 3D-printed models, with students finding them effective for preparation exercises and beneficial in bridging the gap between simulation and real patient situations (question no. 6: 69% positive rating).

conclusionsThe study suggests that 3D printing technology offers a valuable tool in dental education, providing realistic and patient-specific scenarios for students to enhance their skills and readiness for clinical practice. Further improvements in material properties in hand with cost-effective approaches are essential for widespread implementation.

Indexed as

additive manufacturingCAD/CAMdental educationprosthodonticsskill training

Identifiers

PMID39056986
PMCPMC11276254

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.