Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39056947›Full record

ArticleEntropy (Basel, Switzerland)2024

Optimization and Evaluation of Tourism Mascot Design Based on Analytic Hierarchy Process-Entropy Weight Method.

Jing Wang, Fangmin Cheng, Chen Chen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Entropy (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jing WangSchool of Design, Xi'an Technological University, Xi'an 710021, China.
Fangmin ChengSchool of Design, Xi'an Technological University, Xi'an 710021, China.
Chen ChenSchool of Design, Xi'an Technological University, Xi'an 710021, China.

Funding

Social Science Foundation of Shaanxi Province No.2023J036the Scientific Research Plan Projects of the Shaanxi Education Department No. 22JK0097
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With the tourism industry continuing to boom, the importance of tourism mascots in promoting and publicizing tourism destinations is becoming increasingly prominent. Three core dimensions, market trend, appearance design, and audience feedback, are numerically investigated for deeply iterating tourism mascot design. Further, a subjective and objective evaluation weighting model based on the hierarchical analysis method (AHP) and entropy weighting method is proposed, aiming to utilize the advantages of these methods and ensure the entireness and correctness of results. Taking the mascots of six famous tourist attractions in Xi'an as an example, the feasibility and effectiveness of the evaluation model are verified. Data analysis and modeling results confirm that the three core evaluation indexes of scalability, innovation, and recommendation should be focused on in the design of tourism mascots in the three dimensions of market trends, appearance design, and audience feedback. The evaluation index scores are 0.1235, 0.1170, and 0.1123, respectively, which further illustrates the priority of mascot design. The evaluation model constructed by the research provides decision-makers with a comprehensive evaluation tool from the perspective of tourist experience, and also effectively assists the optimization process of mascot design. In addition, the model has good versatility and adaptability in structural design and evaluation logic and can be widely used in the optimization and evaluation research of brand mascots.

Indexed as

analytic hierarchy process–entropy weightdesign optimizationevaluation modeltourism mascot

Identifiers

PMID39056947
PMCPMC11276575

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.