Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39056894›Full record

ArticleEntropy (Basel, Switzerland)2024

Research on Internal Damage Identification of Wire Rope Based on Improved VGG Network.

Pengbo Li, Jie Tian

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Entropy (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Pengbo LiSchool of Mechanical, Electronic and Information Engineering, China University of Mining and Technology (Beijing), Beijing 100083, China.ORCID 0000-0003-2025-5951
Jie TianSchool of Mechanical, Electronic and Information Engineering, China University of Mining and Technology (Beijing), Beijing 100083, China.ORCID 0000-0003-2224-3428

Funding

the Fundamental Research Funds for Central Universities 2022JCCXJD02 and 2022YJSJD09The National Natural Science Foundation of China 51774293
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In order to solve the problem of great difficulty in detecting the internal damage of wire rope, this paper proposes a method to improve the VGG model to identify the internal damage of wire rope. The short-time Fourier transform method is used to transform the wire rope damage signal into a time-frequency spectrogram as the model input, and then the traditional VGG model is improved from three aspects: firstly, the attention mechanism module is introduced to increase the effective feature weights, which effectively improves the recognition accuracy; and then, the batch normalization layer is added to carry out a uniform normalization of the data, so as to make the model easier to converge. At the same time, the pooling layer and the fully connected layer are improved to solve the redundancy problem of the traditional VGG network model, which makes the model structure more lightweight, greatly saves the computational cost, shortens the training time, and finally adopts the joint-sample uniformly distributed cross-entropy as the loss function to solve the overfitting problem and further improve the recognition rate. The experimental results show that the improved VGG model has an identification accuracy of up to 98.84% for the internal damage spectrogram of the wire rope, which shows a good identification ability. Not only that, but the model is also superior, with less time-consuming training and stronger generalization ability.

Indexed as

improved VGG modelinternal damage of wire ropequantitative identificationSTFT methodthe joint samples uniformly distributed cross-entropy

Identifiers

PMID39056894
PMCPMC11276381

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.