Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39056860›Full record

ArticleBiomimetics (Basel, Switzerland)2024

An Improved Football Team Training Algorithm for Global Optimization.

Jun Hou, Yuemei Cui, Ming Rong, Bo Jin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jun HouFaculty of Sports Science, Ningbo University, Ningbo 315211, China.ORCID 0009-0005-6940-9597
Yuemei CuiFaculty of Sports Science, Ningbo University, Ningbo 315211, China.
Ming RongFaculty of Sports Science, Ningbo University, Ningbo 315211, China.
Bo JinInstitute of Systems and Robotics (ISR), Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering (DEEC), University of Coimbra, 3030-290 Coimbra, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0001-9255-5772

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The football team training algorithm (FTTA) is a new metaheuristic algorithm that was proposed in 2024. The FTTA has better performance but faces challenges such as poor convergence accuracy and ease of falling into local optimality due to limitations such as referring too much to the optimal individual for updating and insufficient perturbation of the optimal agent. To address these concerns, this paper presents an improved football team training algorithm called IFTTA. To enhance the exploration ability in the collective training phase, this paper proposes the fitness distance-balanced collective training strategy. This enables the players to train more rationally in the collective training phase and balances the exploration and exploitation capabilities of the algorithm. To further perturb the optimal agent in FTTA, a non-monopoly extra training strategy is designed to enhance the ability to get rid of the local optimum. In addition, a population restart strategy is then designed to boost the convergence accuracy and population diversity of the algorithm. In this paper, we validate the performance of IFTTA and FTTA as well as six comparison algorithms in CEC2017 test suites. The experimental results show that IFTTA has strong optimization performance. Moreover, several engineering-constrained optimization problems confirm the potential of IFTTA to solve real-world optimization problems.

Indexed as

fitness distance-balanced strategyfootball team training algorithmmetaheuristic algorithmsnon-monopoly extra training strategypopulation restart strategy

Identifiers

PMID39056860
PMCPMC11274895

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.