Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39056832›Full record

ArticleBiomimetics (Basel, Switzerland)2024

Assessment of Pepper Robot's Speech Recognition System through the Lens of Machine Learning.

Akshara Pande, Deepti Mishra

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Akshara PandeEducational Technology Laboratory, Intelligent System and Analytics Group, Department of Computer Science (IDI), Norwegian University of Science and Technology, 2815 Gjøvik, Norway.
Deepti MishraEducational Technology Laboratory, Intelligent System and Analytics Group, Department of Computer Science (IDI), Norwegian University of Science and Technology, 2815 Gjøvik, Norway.ORCID 0000-0001-5144-3811

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Speech comprehension can be challenging due to multiple factors, causing inconvenience for both the speaker and the listener. In such situations, using a humanoid robot, Pepper, can be beneficial as it can display the corresponding text on its screen. However, prior to that, it is essential to carefully assess the accuracy of the audio recordings captured by Pepper. Therefore, in this study, an experiment is conducted with eight participants with the primary objective of examining Pepper's speech recognition system with the help of audio features such as Mel-Frequency Cepstral Coefficients, spectral centroid, spectral flatness, the Zero-Crossing Rate, pitch, and energy. Furthermore, the K-means algorithm was employed to create clusters based on these features with the aim of selecting the most suitable cluster with the help of the speech-to-text conversion tool Whisper. The selection of the best cluster is accomplished by finding the maximum accuracy data points lying in a cluster. A criterion of discarding data points with values of WER above 0.3 is imposed to achieve this. The findings of this study suggest that a distance of up to one meter from the humanoid robot Pepper is suitable for capturing the best speech recordings. In contrast, age and gender do not influence the accuracy of recorded speech. The proposed system will provide a significant strength in settings where subtitles are required to improve the comprehension of spoken statements.

Indexed as

audio featuresevaluation metricsK-means clusteringPepper robotspeech recognition

Identifiers

PMID39056832
PMCPMC11274617

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.