ReviewBiology2024
Revalidation of DNA Fragmentation Analyses for Human Sperm-Measurement Principles, Comparative Standards, Calibration Curve, Required Sensitivity, and Eligibility Criteria for Test Sperm.
Review in Biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evaluation of Human Sperm Quality In Vitro-Purification of Motile Sperm and Subsequent Assessment of Potential Apoptotic Signs Beyond DNA Fragmentation.Biomolecules · 2026Review
- Protamine labeling with Reactive Black-5 and its molecularly designed derivatives visualize vacuoles in human sperm head.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
(1) Background: Double-strand breaks (DSBs) in a single nucleus are usually measured using the sperm chromatin structure assay (SCSA), sperm chromatin dispersion (SCD) test, and comet assay (CA). Mono-dimensional single-cell pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (1D-SCPFGE) and angle-modulated two- dimensional single-cell pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (2D-SCPFGE) were developed to observe DNA fragmentation in separated motile sperm. (2) Methods: Comparative standards, calibration curves, required sensitivity levels, and eligibility criteria for test sperm were set up to validate the measurement principles of these tests. (3) Results: The conventional methods overlooked the interference of nucleoproteins in their measurements. In-gel proteolysis improves the measurement accuracies of 1D- and 2D-SCPFGE. Naked DNA is suitable for comparative standards and test specimens. Moreover, several dysfunctions that might induce DNA damage are observed in the separated motile sperm. Overall, the discussion highlights the need to revisit the conventional univariable analyses based on the SCSA, SCD test, and CA. (4) Conclusions: Human infertility is a complex syndrome, and the aim of quality control in intracytoplasmic sperm injection is to identify the underlying dysfunctions remaining in the separated motile sperm that render them ineligible for injection. Multivariable analyses with special consideration to confounding factors are necessary in future cohort studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.