Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39056662›Full record

ArticleBiology2024

Bone Regeneration and Polyetheretherketone Implants in Maxillo-Facial Surgery and Neurosurgery: A Multidisciplinary Study.

Mattia Todaro, Gianmarco Saponaro, Federico Perquoti, Giulio Gasparini, Francesco Signorelli, Tommaso Tartaglione, Alessandro Moro

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Mattia TodaroMaxillo Facial Surgery Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Agostino Gemelli IRCCS Hospital, 8 Largo Agostino Gemelli, 00168 Rome, Italy.
Gianmarco SaponaroMaxillo Facial Surgery Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Agostino Gemelli IRCCS Hospital, 8 Largo Agostino Gemelli, 00168 Rome, Italy.
Federico PerquotiMaxillo Facial Surgery Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Agostino Gemelli IRCCS Hospital, 8 Largo Agostino Gemelli, 00168 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0009-0009-2602-5074
Giulio GaspariniMaxillo Facial Surgery Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Agostino Gemelli IRCCS Hospital, 8 Largo Agostino Gemelli, 00168 Rome, Italy.
Francesco SignorelliNeurosurgery Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Agostino Gemelli IRCCS Hospital, 8 Largo Agostino Gemelli, 00168 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-8431-0433
Tommaso TartaglioneRadiology Department, Fondazione Policlinico Agostino Gemelli IRCCS Hospital, 8 Largo Agostino Gemelli, 00168 Rome, Italy.
Alessandro MoroMaxillo Facial Surgery Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Agostino Gemelli IRCCS Hospital, 8 Largo Agostino Gemelli, 00168 Rome, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) in the last few years has emerged as an exceedingly promising material for craniofacial defects due to its biocompatibility and mechanical properties. However, its utilization remains controversial due to its inertness and low osteoinductivity. This study aimed to investigate the postoperative outcomes of patients undergoing maxillo-facial and neurosurgical procedures with PEEK implants. The focus is on evaluating bone regrowth on the surface and edges of the implant, periosteal reactions, and implant positioning. A retrospective analysis of 12 maxillo-facial surgery patients and 10 neurosurgery patients who received PEEK implants was conducted. CT scans performed at least one year post operation were examined for bone regrowth, periosteal reactions, and implant positioning. In maxillo-facial cases, the analysis included mandibular angle and fronto-orbital reconstruction, while neurosurgical cases involved cranioplasty. In maxillofacial surgery, 11 out of 12 patients showed radiological evidence of bone regrowth around PEEK implants, with favorable outcomes observed in craniofacial reconstruction. In neurosurgery, 9 out of 10 patients exhibited minimal or none bone regrowth, while one case demonstrated notable bone regeneration beneath the PEEK implant interface. The study highlights the importance of implant design and patient-specific factors in achieving successful outcomes, providing valuable insights for future implant-based procedures.

Indexed as

cranioplastymaxillo-facial reconstructionPEEK prosthesisreconstructive surgery

Identifiers

PMID39056662
PMCPMC11273635

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.