ArticleBiosensors2024
A Scalable, Programmable Neural Stimulator for Enhancing Generalizability in Neural Interface Applications.
Article in Biosensors, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Each application of neurostimulators requires unique stimulation parameter specifications to achieve effective stimulation. Balancing the current magnitude with stimulation resolution, waveform, size, and channel count is challenging, leading to a loss of generalizability across broad neural interfaces. To address this, this paper proposes a highly scalable, programmable neurostimulator with a System-on-Chip (SOC) capable of 32 channels of independent stimulation. The compliance voltage reaches up to ±22.5 V. A pair of 8-bit current-mode DACs support independent waveforms for source and sink operations and feature a user-selectable dual range for low-current intraparenchymal microstimulation with a resolution of 4.31 μA/bit, as well as high current stimulation for spinal cord and DBS applications with a resolution of 48.00 μA/bit, achieving a wide stimulation range of 12.24 mA while maintaining high-resolution biological stimulation. A dedicated communication protocol enables full programmable control of stimulation waveforms, effectively improving the range of stimulation parameters. In vivo electrophysiological experiments successfully validate the functionality of the proposed stimulator. This flexible stimulator architecture aims to enhance its generality across a wide range of neural interfaces and will provide more diverse and refined stimulation strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.