Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39056516›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics2025

Infertility following trisomic pregnancies: A nationwide cohort study.

Satu Wedenoja, Mika Pihlajamäki, Mika Gissler, Juho Wedenoja, Hanna Öhman, Seppo Heinonen, Juha Kere, Helena Kääriäinen, Laura Tanner

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Infertility following trisomic pregnancies: A nationwide cohort study.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Satu WedenojaInformation Brokers, Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare, Helsinki, Finland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0212-4851
Mika PihlajamäkiInformation Brokers, Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare, Helsinki, Finland.
Mika GisslerInformation Brokers, Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare, Helsinki, Finland.
Juho WedenojaDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.
Hanna ÖhmanBiobank Borealis of Northern Finland, Oulu University Hospital, Oulu, Finland.
Seppo HeinonenObstetrics and Gynecology, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.
Juha KereStem Cells and Metabolism Research Program, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
Helena KääriäinenGenomics and Biomarkers Unit, National Institute for Health and Welfare, Helsinki, Finland.
Laura TannerDepartment of Clinical Genetics, Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.

Funding

Juhani Ahon Lääketieteen TutkimussäätiöPäivikki ja Sakari Sohlbergin Säätiö
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo study whether gynecologic or reproductive disorders show association with trisomic conceptions.

methodsThis nationwide cohort study utilized the Registry of Congenital Malformations to identify women who had a trisomic pregnancy (n = 5784), either with trisomy 13 (T13; n = 351), trisomy 18 (T18; n = 1065) or trisomy 21 (T21; n = 4369) from 1987 to 2018. We used the Finnish Maternity cohort to match the cases to population controls (n = 34 422) on the age, residence, and timing of pregnancy. These data were cross-linked to the ICD-10 diagnoses of the national Care Registry for Health Care data on specialized health care in Finland during 1996 to 2019. Both inflammatory (ICD-10 diagnoses: N70-N77) and noninflammatory disorders of the genital tract (N80-N98) were studied. Crude odds ratios (ORs) with 95% CIs were calculated for associations between diagnoses and trisomic conceptions.

resultsThe diagnosis of female infertility (N97) at any time was associated with trisomic conceptions (OR: 1.19, 95% CI: 1.08-1.32). In the subgroup analysis, this association was found for T18 (OR: 1.29, 95% CI: 1.03-1.61) and T21 (OR: 1.17, 95% CI: 1.04-1.32), but not for T13 (OR: 1.15, 95% CI: 0.75-1.72). When restricting the timing of the diagnosis of female infertility, an elevated OR was found only after the index pregnancy (OR: 1.81, 95% CI: 1.56-2.09). These increased odds for infertility after trisomic conceptions were observed both in women <35 years (T18 OR: 1.91, 95% CI: 1.21-3.00; T21 OR: 1.68, 95% CI: 1.31-2.14) and in women ≥35 years (T18 OR: 2.17, 95% CI: 1.40-3.33; T21 OR: 1.87; 95% CI: 1.47-2.39), but not after T13 conceptions.

conclusionOur observational data suggest a link between trisomic conceptions and subsequent diagnoses of infertility but do not demonstrate causality. These data implicate that partially similar mechanisms might predispose to trisomy and infertility, regardless of maternal age.

Indexed as

Infertility, FemaleAdultCohort StudiesDown SyndromeFemaleFinlandHumansPregnancyRegistriesTrisomy 13 SyndromeTrisomy 18 SyndromeYoung Adultepidemiologyinfertilitymaternal agerisk factortrisomy

Identifiers

PMID39056516
PMCPMC11649879

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.