Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39056474›Full record

ArticleThe Plant cell2024

Transcriptomic response to nitrogen availability reveals signatures of adaptive plasticity during tetraploid wheat domestication.

Alice Pieri, Romina Beleggia, Tania Gioia, Hao Tong, Valerio Di Vittori, Giulia Frascarelli, Elena Bitocchi, Laura Nanni, Elisa Bellucci, Fabio Fiorani and 10 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Plant cell, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors.

Alice PieriDepartment of Agricultural, Food and Environmental Sciences, Marche Polytechnic University, via Brecce Bianche, Ancona 60131, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-1950-954X
Romina BeleggiaCouncil for Agricultural Research and Economics (CREA), Research Centre for Cereal and Industrial Crops (CREA-CI), Foggia 71122, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-2880-5033
Tania GioiaSchool of Agricultural, Forestry, Food and Environmental Sciences, University of Basilicata, Potenza 85100, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-8980-3034
Hao TongBioinformatics Department, Institute of Biochemistry and Biology, University of Potsdam, Potsdam 14476, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-4856-1336
Valerio Di VittoriDepartment of Agricultural, Food and Environmental Sciences, Marche Polytechnic University, via Brecce Bianche, Ancona 60131, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-3796-8587
Giulia FrascarelliDepartment of Agricultural, Food and Environmental Sciences, Marche Polytechnic University, via Brecce Bianche, Ancona 60131, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-0114-7314
Elena BitocchiDepartment of Agricultural, Food and Environmental Sciences, Marche Polytechnic University, via Brecce Bianche, Ancona 60131, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-2152-4634
Laura NanniDepartment of Agricultural, Food and Environmental Sciences, Marche Polytechnic University, via Brecce Bianche, Ancona 60131, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-1249-5165
Elisa BellucciDepartment of Agricultural, Food and Environmental Sciences, Marche Polytechnic University, via Brecce Bianche, Ancona 60131, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-1636-0719
Fabio FioraniInstitute of Biosciences and Geosciences (IBG-2): Plant Sciences, Forschungszentrum Julich GmbH, Julich 52428, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-8775-1541
Nicola PecchioniCouncil for Agricultural Research and Economics (CREA), Research Centre for Cereal and Industrial Crops (CREA-CI), Foggia 71122, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-1704-2541
Stefania MarzarioSchool of Agricultural, Forestry, Food and Environmental Sciences, University of Basilicata, Potenza 85100, Italy.ORCID 0009-0005-3014-0869
Concetta De QuattroDepartment of Biotechnology, University of Verona, Strada Le Grazie 15, Verona 37134, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-2885-5468
Antonina Rita LimongiDepartment of Biotechnology, University of Verona, Strada Le Grazie 15, Verona 37134, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-1570-8370
Pasquale De VitaCouncil for Agricultural Research and Economics (CREA), Research Centre for Cereal and Industrial Crops (CREA-CI), Foggia 71122, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-9573-0510
Marzia RossatoDepartment of Biotechnology, University of Verona, Strada Le Grazie 15, Verona 37134, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-6101-1550
Ulrich SchurrInstitute of Biosciences and Geosciences (IBG-2): Plant Sciences, Forschungszentrum Julich GmbH, Julich 52428, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-0369-8777
Jacques L DavidAGAP, Univ. Montpellier, CIRAD, INRAE, Institut Agro, Montpellier 34060, France.ORCID 0000-0002-2925-2258
Zoran NikoloskiBioinformatics Department, Institute of Biochemistry and Biology, University of Potsdam, Potsdam 14476, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-2671-6763
Roberto PapaDepartment of Agricultural, Food and Environmental Sciences, Marche Polytechnic University, via Brecce Bianche, Ancona 60131, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-9598-3131

Funding

Agrofood Science and SafetyEuropean Plant Phenotyping Network 284443FP7 Research InfrastructuresHorizon 2020 862201Università Politecnica delle Marche
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The domestication of crops, coupled with agroecosystem development, is associated with major environmental changes and provides an ideal model of phenotypic plasticity. Here, we examined 32 genotypes of three tetraploid wheat (Triticum turgidum L.) subspecies, wild emmer, emmer, and durum wheat, which are representative of the key stages in the domestication of tetraploid wheat. We developed a pipeline that integrates RNA-Seq data and population genomics to assess gene expression plasticity and identify selection signatures under diverse nitrogen availability conditions. Our analysis revealed differing gene expression responses to nitrogen availability across primary (wild emmer to emmer) and secondary (emmer to durum wheat) domestication. Notably, nitrogen triggered the expression of twice as many genes in durum wheat compared to that in emmer and wild emmer. Unique selection signatures were identified at each stage: primary domestication mainly influenced genes related to biotic interactions, whereas secondary domestication affected genes related to amino acid metabolism, in particular lysine. Selection signatures were found in differentially expressed genes (DEGs), notably those associated with nitrogen metabolism, such as the gene encoding glutamate dehydrogenase (GDH). Overall, our study highlights the pivotal role of nitrogen availability in the domestication and adaptive responses of a major food crop, with varying effects across different traits and growth conditions.

Indexed as

DomesticationGene Expression Regulation, PlantNitrogenTetraploidyTranscriptomeTriticumGenotypeNitrogen

Identifiers

PMID39056474
PMCPMC11371143

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.