Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39056339›Full record

Trial reportJournal of the American Heart Association2024

Acute Declines in Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate in Patients Treated With Benazepril and Hydrochlorothiazide Versus Amlodipine and Risk of Cardiovascular Outcomes.

Elaine Ku, Kenneth Jamerson, Timothy P Copeland, Charles E McCulloch, Hocine Tighiouart, Mark J Sarnak

Abstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIIComparative StudyMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of the American Heart Association, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Elaine KuDivision of Nephrology, Department of Medicine University of California San Francisco CA.ORCID 0000-0002-7774-2526
Kenneth JamersonDepartment of Medicine, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine University of Michigan Ann-Arbor Ann-Arbor MI.ORCID 0000-0003-2936-0619
Timothy P CopelandDivision of Nephrology, Department of Medicine University of California San Francisco CA.ORCID 0000-0002-3813-3576
Charles E McCullochDepartment of Epidemiology & Biostatistics University of California San Francisco CA.ORCID 0000-0002-1279-6179
Hocine TighiouartInstitute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies Tufts Medical Center Boston MA.ORCID 0000-0003-1448-327X
Mark J SarnakTufts Clinical and Translational Science Institute Tufts University Boston MA.

Funding

Acute declines in kidney function during blood pressure interventions in CKDR01DK121904 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI KU, ELAINE, SARNAK, MARK J · 2020 to 2023
$2.9M
NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK121904
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAcute declines in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) occur commonly after starting angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors. Whether declines in eGFR that occur after simultaneously starting angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors with other antihypertensive agents modifies the benefits of these agents on cardiovascular outcomes is unclear. METHODS AND

resultsWe identified predictors of acute declines in eGFR (>15% over 3 months) during randomization to benazepril plus amlodipine versus benazepril plus hydrochlorothiazide in the ACCOMPLISH (Avoiding Cardiovascular Events through Combination Therapy in Patients Living with Systolic Hypertension) trial. We then determined the relation between declines in eGFR (treated as a binary variable, ≤15% versus >15% and separately, as a restricted spline variable) and the composite risk of fatal and nonfatal cardiovascular events using Cox proportional hazards models. We included 10 714 participants (median age 68 years [Q1 63, Q3 73]), of whom 1024 reached the trial end point over median follow-up of 2.8 years. Predictors of acute declines in eGFR>15% over 3 months included assignment to hydrochlorothiazide (versus amlodipine) and higher baseline albuminuria. Overall, declines in eGFR ≥15% (versus <15%) were associated with a 26% higher hazard of cardiovascular outcomes (95% CI, 1.07-1.48). In spline-based analysis, risk for cardiovascular outcomes was higher in the hydrochlorothiazide arm at every level of decline in eGFR compared with the same magnitude of eGFR decline in the amlodipine arm.

conclusionCombined use of benazepril and amlodipine remains superior to benazepril and hydrochlorothiazide for cardiovascular outcomes, regardless of the magnitude of the decline in eGFR that occurred with initiation of therapy.

Indexed as

AmlodipineAngiotensin-Converting Enzyme InhibitorsAntihypertensive AgentsBenzazepinesDrug Therapy, CombinationGlomerular Filtration RateHydrochlorothiazideHypertensionAgedCalcium Channel BlockersCardiovascular DiseasesFemaleHumansKidneyMaleMiddle AgedAmlodipineAngiotensin-Converting Enzyme InhibitorsAntihypertensive AgentsbenazeprilBenzazepinesCalcium Channel BlockersHydrochlorothiazideantihypertensive therapycardiovascular diseasehypertension

Identifiers

PMID39056339
PMCPMC11964039

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.