A triple

Y Jiang, L Mou, X Li

Abstract readCase Reports

In one paragraph

Article in Hippokratia. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it

0cells of the map it votes in

0citing papers in PubMed

–field-weighted citation impact

1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Y JiangDepartment of Nephrology, The Quzhou Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Quzhou People's Hospital, Quzhou, China.

L MouDepartment of Nephrology, Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.

X LiDepartment of Nephrology (Key Laboratory of Kidney Disease Prevention and Control Technology, Zhejiang Province), Hangzhou TCM Hospital Affiliated to Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Gitelman syndrome (GS) is a rare autosomal recessive salt-losing tubulopathy. Mutations in the Case presentation: We report the case of a 33-year-old man admitted with recurrent limb weakness for six years. Laboratory tests showed hypokalemic alkalosis, hypocalciuria and renal potassium wasting; serum magnesium and aldosterone were normal, and ultrasound and computed tomography scans showed right-sided renal calculus. A hydrochlorothiazide test was performed, which showed a blunted response to hydrochlorothiazide. Next-generation sequencing identified triple mutations in Conclusions: The patient was diagnosed with Gitelman syndrome by genetic testing, accompanied by kidney stones. Although kidney stones are rare in Gitelman syndrome, they are not excluded as a criterion. The composition of kidney stones may be of significance for diagnosis and treatment. HIPPOKRATIA 2023, 27 (2):64-68.

Indexed as

Gitelman syndromerenal calculusSLC12A3triple mutations

Identifiers

PMID39056097

PMCPMC11268311

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata

Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.