Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39056077›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2024

Feasibility and efficacy of a novel audiovisual tool to increase colorectal cancer screening among rural Appalachian Kentucky adults.

Aaron J Kruse-Diehr, Derek Cegelka, Elizabeth Holtsclaw, Jean S Edward, Sarah C Vos, Melissa Karrer, Katie Bathje, Melinda Rogers, Elaine Russell, Jennifer Redmond Knight

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Aaron J Kruse-DiehrUniversity of Kentucky College of Medicine, Lexington, KY, United States.
Derek CegelkaHawaii Pacific University School of Nursing, Honolulu, HI, United States.
Elizabeth HoltsclawAmerican Cancer Society, Atlanta, GA, United States.
Jean S EdwardMarkey Cancer Center, Lexington, KY, United States.
Sarah C VosUniversity of Kentucky College of Public Health, Lexington, KY, United States.
Melissa KarrerKentucky CancerLink, Lexington, KY, United States.
Katie BathjeAmerican Cancer Society, Atlanta, GA, United States.
Melinda RogersMarkey Cancer Center, Lexington, KY, United States.
Elaine RussellKentucky Cancer Consortium, Lexington, KY, United States.
Jennifer Redmond KnightMarkey Cancer Center, Lexington, KY, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Residents of Appalachian regions in Kentucky experience increased colorectal cancer (CRC) incidence and mortality. While population-based screening methods, such as fecal immunochemical tests (FITs), can reduce many screening barriers, written instructions to complete FIT can be challenging for some individuals. We developed a novel audiovisual tool ("talking card") to educate and motivate accurate FIT completion and assessed its feasibility, acceptability, and efficacy. Materials and methods: We collected data on the talking card via: (1) cross-sectional surveys exploring perceptions of images, messaging, and perceived utility; (2) follow-up focus groups centered on feasibility and acceptability; and (3) efficacy testing in community-based FIT distribution events, where we assessed FIT completion rate, number of positive vs. negative screens, demographic characteristics of participants, and primary drivers of FIT completion. Results: Across the three study phases, 692 individuals participated. Survey respondents positively identified with the card's sounds and images, found it highly acceptable, and reported high-to-very high self-efficacy and response efficacy for completing FIT, with nearly half noting greater likelihood to complete screening after using the tool. Focus group participants confirmed the acceptability of the individuals featured on the card. Nearly 75% of participants provided a FIT accurately completed it, with most indicating the talking card, either alone or combined with another strategy, helped with completion. Discussion: To reduce CRC screening disparities among Appalachian Kentuckians, population-based screening using contextually relevant implementation strategies must be used alongside clinic-based education. The talking card represents a novel and promising strategy to promote screening uptake in both clinical and community settings.

Indexed as

Colorectal NeoplasmsEarly Detection of CancerFeasibility StudiesFocus GroupsRural PopulationAdultAgedAppalachian RegionAudiovisual AidsCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansKentuckyMaleMass ScreeningMiddle AgedAppalachiacancer screeningcolorectal cancerhealth communicationrural

Identifiers

PMID39056077
PMCPMC11269215

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.