Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39056062›Full record

ArticleChemical & biomedical imaging2024

Spatial Resolution for X-ray Excited Luminescence Chemical Imaging (XELCI).

Apeksha C Rajamanthrilage, Unaiza Uzair, Paul W Millhouse, Matthew J Case, Donald W Benza, Jeffrey N Anker

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Chemical & biomedical imaging, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Apeksha C RajamanthrilageDepartment of Chemistry, Clemson University, Clemson, South Carolina 29634, United States.
Unaiza UzairDepartment of Chemistry, Clemson University, Clemson, South Carolina 29634, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8249-8791
Paul W MillhouseDepartment of Chemistry, Clemson University, Clemson, South Carolina 29634, United States.
Matthew J CaseDepartment of Chemistry, Clemson University, Clemson, South Carolina 29634, United States.
Donald W BenzaDepartment of Chemistry, Clemson University, Clemson, South Carolina 29634, United States.
Jeffrey N AnkerDepartment of Chemistry, Clemson University, Clemson, South Carolina 29634, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9544-2367

Funding

Detecting and Monitoring Implant Infection Using X-ray Excited Luminescence Chemical Imaging (XELCI)R01AR070305 · NIAMS · CLEMSON UNIVERSITY · PI ANKER, JEFFREY N · 2016 to 2020
$1.6M
NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR070305
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Measuring chemical concentrations at the surface of implanted medical devices is important for elucidating the local biochemical environment, especially during implant infection. Although chemical indicator dyes enable chemical measurements in vitro, they are usually ineffective when measuring through tissue because the background obscures the dye signal and scattering dramatically reduces the spatial resolution. X-ray excited luminescent chemical imaging (XELCI) is a recent imaging modality which overcomes these limitations using a focused X-ray beam to excite a small spot of red light on scintillator-coated medical implants with well-defined location (because X-rays are minimally scattered) and low background. A spectrochemical indicator film placed over the scintillator layer, e.g., a polymer film containing pH-indicator dyes, absorbs some of the luminescence according to the local chemical environment, and this absorption is then detected by measuring the light intensity/spectrum passing through the tissue. A focused X-ray beam is used to scan point-by-point with a spatial resolution mainly limited by the X-ray beam width with minimum increase from X-ray absorption and scattering in the tissue. X-ray resolution, implant surface specificity, and chemical sensitivity are the three key features of XELCI. Here, we study spatial resolution using optically absorptive targets. For imaging a series of lines, the 20-80% knife-edge resolution was ∼285 (±15) μm with no tissue and 475 ± 18 and 520 ± 34 μm, respectively, through 5 and 10 mm thick tissue. Thus, doubling the tissue depth did not appreciably change the spatial resolution recorded through the tissue. This shows the promise of XELCI for submillimeter chemical imaging through tissue.

Identifiers

PMID39056062
PMCPMC11267601

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.