Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39056053›Full record

ArticlePeerJ2024

Identifying highly connected sites for risk-based surveillance and control of cucurbit downy mildew in the eastern United States.

Awino M E Ojwang', Alun L Lloyd, Sharmodeep Bhattacharyya, Shirshendu Chatterjee, David H Gent, Peter S Ojiambo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Awino M E Ojwang'Biomathematics Graduate Program and Department of Mathematics, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, United States.
Alun L LloydBiomathematics Graduate Program and Department of Mathematics, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-6389-6321
Sharmodeep BhattacharyyaDepartment of Statistics, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-5011-4119
Shirshendu ChatterjeeDepartment of Mathematics, City University of New York, City College, New York, NY, United States.
David H GentAgricultural Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Corvallis, OR, United States.
Peter S OjiamboCenter for Integrated Fungal Research, Department of Entomology and Plant Pathology, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, United States.

Funding

Department of Agriculture, National Institute of Food and Agriculture 2016-68004-24931North Carolina Agriculture Experiment Station
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Surveillance is critical for the rapid implementation of control measures for diseases caused by aerially dispersed plant pathogens, but such programs can be resource-intensive, especially for epidemics caused by long-distance dispersed pathogens. The current cucurbit downy mildew platform for monitoring, predicting and communicating the risk of disease spread in the United States is expensive to maintain. In this study, we focused on identifying sites critical for surveillance and treatment in an attempt to reduce disease monitoring costs and determine where control may be applied to mitigate the risk of disease spread. Methods: Static networks were constructed based on the distance between fields, while dynamic networks were constructed based on the distance between fields and wind speed and direction, using disease data collected from 2008 to 2016. Three strategies were used to identify highly connected field sites. First, the probability of pathogen transmission between nodes and the probability of node infection were modeled over a discrete weekly time step within an epidemic year. Second, nodes identified as important were selectively removed from networks and the probability of node infection was recalculated in each epidemic year. Third, the recurring patterns of node infection were analyzed across epidemic years. Results: Static networks exhibited scale-free properties where the node degree followed a power-law distribution. Betweenness centrality was the most useful metric for identifying important nodes within the networks that were associated with disease transmission and prediction. Based on betweenness centrality, field sites in Maryland, North Carolina, Ohio, South Carolina and Virginia were the most central in the disease network across epidemic years. Removing field sites identified as important limited the predicted risk of disease spread based on the dynamic network model. Conclusions: Combining the dynamic network model and centrality metrics facilitated the identification of highly connected fields in the southeastern United States and the mid-Atlantic region. These highly connected sites may be used to inform surveillance and strategies for controlling cucurbit downy mildew in the eastern United States.

Indexed as

Plant DiseasesUnited StatesCentrality measuresDisease monitoringInfection frequencyNetwork analysisScale-free network

Identifiers

PMID39056053
PMCPMC11271662

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.