Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39055931›Full record

ArticleiScience2024

ChatFFA: An ophthalmic chat system for unified vision-language understanding and question answering for fundus fluorescein angiography.

Xiaolan Chen, Pusheng Xu, Yao Li, Weiyi Zhang, Fan Song, Mingguang He, Danli Shi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in iScience, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Xiaolan ChenSchool of Optometry, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Kowloon, Hong Kong.
Pusheng XuState Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Ocular Diseases, Guangzhou 510060, China.
Yao LiUniversity of Waterloo, Computer Science, 200 University Avenue W 0, Waterloo, Canada.
Weiyi ZhangSchool of Optometry, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Kowloon, Hong Kong.
Fan SongSchool of Optometry, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Kowloon, Hong Kong.
Mingguang HeSchool of Optometry, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Kowloon, Hong Kong.
Danli ShiSchool of Optometry, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Kowloon, Hong Kong.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Existing automatic analysis of fundus fluorescein angiography (FFA) images faces limitations, including a predetermined set of possible image classifications and being confined to text-based question-answering (QA) approaches. This study aims to address these limitations by developing an end-to-end unified model that utilizes synthetic data to train a visual question-answering model for FFA images. To achieve this, we employed ChatGPT to generate 4,110,581 QA pairs for a large FFA dataset, which encompassed a total of 654,343 FFA images from 9,392 participants. We then fine-tuned the Bootstrapping Language-Image Pre-training (BLIP) framework to enable simultaneous handling of vision and language. The performance of the fine-tuned model (ChatFFA) was thoroughly evaluated through automated and manual assessments, as well as case studies based on an external validation set, demonstrating satisfactory results. In conclusion, our ChatFFA system paves the way for improved efficiency and feasibility in medical imaging analysis by leveraging generative large language models.

Indexed as

Artificial intelligenceOphthalmology

Identifiers

PMID39055931
PMCPMC11269310

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.