ArticleOman medical journal2024
Meningioma Prognostic Tool Based on Correlation of Histopathological Grading and Immunohistochemistry.
Article in Oman medical journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: Meningiomas are slow-growing brain neoplasms classified into three grades based on morphological criteria. While these grades are simple, they do not always correlate with patient outcomes. This study aimed to evaluate the status of estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), and proliferation marker Ki-67/molecular immunology borstel-1 (MIB-1) in the three grades of meningioma. Methods: We evaluated the data of meningioma patients who were seen in our tertiary center over 10 years-8.5 years retrospectively and 1.5 years prospectively. Their archival hematoxylin and eosin stained slides were reviewed and re-graded according to the World Health Organization 2021 criteria. Immunohistochemical analysis for ER, PR, and Ki-67 was performed on all grade 2 and grade 3 meningiomas and 30 cases of grade 1 formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded samples. Results: Of the 276 cases included in the study, there were 231 (83.7%) cases of grade 1 meningioma, 34 (12.3%) cases of grade 2, and 11 (4.0%) cases of grade 3. ER was positive in 26.0% of grade 1 tumors, 5.8% of grade 2, and 0.0% of grade 3. PR was positive in 70.0% of grade 1 tumors, 20.0% of grade 2, and 18.0% of grade 3. The Ki-67/MIB-1 labeling index (LI) was 2.1 in grade 1, 6.3 in grade 2, and 13.4 in grade 3 tumors. For both PR and Ki-67, the differences between grades 1, 2, and 3 tumors were significant ( Conclusions: Ki-67/MIB-1 LI has significant positive correlations with meningioma grade and its recurrence, which makes it a useful auxiliary method for the routine assessment of meningiomas, especially in patients with borderline atypia. The expression of PR, on the other hand, is a positive prognostic indicator and has a substantial correlation with histological grade. In cases of subtotal resection, high proliferative/recurrence rates, and borderline histopathology, the PR status in combination with the MIB-1 LI can offer insights into the behavior and the recurrence probability of a meningioma.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.