Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39055889›Full record

ReviewOncology research2024

Pharmacological methods for ovarian function and fertility preservation in women with cancer: A literature review.

Ana S Cvetanovic, Matteo Lambertini, Kevin Punie, Gorana G Matovina Brko, Nikola D Zivkovic, Maja J Popovic, Marijana M Milovic Kovacevic, Lazar S Popovic

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Oncology research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Ana S CvetanovicDepartment for Oncology, Medical Faculty Nis, University of Nis, Nis, 18000, Serbia.
Matteo LambertiniDepartment of Internal Medicine and Medical Sciences (DiMI), School of Medicine, University of Genova, Genova, 16100, Italy.
Kevin PunieDepartment of General Medical Oncology and Multidisciplinary Breast Centre, Leuven Cancer Institute, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, 3001, Belgium.
Gorana G Matovina BrkoDepartment of Medical Oncology, Oncology Institute of Vojvodina, Sremska Kamenica, 21208, Serbia.
Nikola D ZivkovicDepartment for Pathology, Medical Faculty Nis, University of Nis, Nis, 18000, Serbia.
Maja J PopovicDepartment of Medical Oncology, Oncology Institute of Vojvodina, Sremska Kamenica, 21208, Serbia.
Marijana M Milovic KovacevicDepartment of Medical Oncology, Institute of Oncology and Radiology Serbia, Belgrade, 11000, Serbia.
Lazar S PopovicDepartment of Medical Oncology, Oncology Institute of Vojvodina, Sremska Kamenica, 21208, Serbia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Oncofertility is an extremely significant topic that is increasingly being discussed owing to increased evidence indicating that fertility preservation does not affect the treatment outcomes of patients with cancer but significantly contributes to preserving life quality. The effect of chemotherapy can range from minimal effects to complete ovarian atrophy. Limited data are available on the effects of monoclonal antibodies and targeted therapies on the ovaries and fertility. Temporary ovarian suppression by administering a gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRHa) during chemotherapy decreases the gonadotoxic effect of chemotherapy, thereby diminishing the chance of developing premature ovarian insufficiency (POI). At present, the concomitant administration of GnRH analogs during chemotherapy is the only accepted pharmacological method for preserving ovarian function. Notably, most randomized studies on the effectiveness of luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone agonists during chemotherapy in preventing POI have been conducted in women with breast cancer, with a considerably small number of studies on patients with hematological malignancies. Furthermore, most randomized controlled trials on breast cancer have revealed a decrease in treatment-induced POI risk, regardless of the hormone receptor status. In addition, studies on hematological malignancies have yielded negative results; nevertheless, the findings must be interpreted with caution owing to numerous limitations. Current guidelines from the American Society of Clinical Oncology and ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines recommend sperm, oocyte, and embryo cryopreservation as a standard practice and only offering GnRHa to patients when proven fertility preservation methods are not feasible. In this manuscript, we present a comprehensive literature overview on the application of ovarian suppression with GnRHa during chemotherapy in patients with cancer by addressing preclinical and clinical data, as well as future perspectives in this field that upcoming research should focus on.

Indexed as

Fertility PreservationGonadotropin-Releasing HormoneNeoplasmsOvaryPrimary Ovarian InsufficiencyAntineoplastic AgentsCryopreservationFemaleHumansAntineoplastic AgentsGonadotropin-Releasing HormoneFertility preservationGonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists (GnRHa)Premature ovarian insufficiency (POI)Premenopausal patients

Identifiers

PMID39055889
PMCPMC11267035

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.