Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39055816›Full record

ArticleHeliyon2024

Refractive and ocular biometric characteristics of non-myopic and pseudomyopic eyes in mild hyperopic Chinese children aged 3-12 years.

Yujia Liu, Jianmin Shang, Yuliang Wang, Xingxue Zhu, Chaoying Ye, Xiaomei Qu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Yujia LiuDepartment of Ophthalmology and Vision Science, Eye and ENT Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Jianmin ShangDepartment of Ophthalmology and Vision Science, Eye and ENT Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Yuliang WangDepartment of Ophthalmology and Vision Science, Eye and ENT Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Xingxue ZhuDepartment of Ophthalmology and Vision Science, Eye and ENT Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Chaoying YeDepartment of Ophthalmology and Vision Science, Eye and ENT Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Xiaomei QuDepartment of Ophthalmology and Vision Science, Eye and ENT Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: To investigate the refractive and ocular biometric characteristics of children with mild hyperopia and distinguish between non-myopic and pseudomyopic eyes before cycloplegia. Methods: The eligible children underwent refractive error measurements using a NIDEK autorefractor before and after the administration of 0.5 % tropicamide. Ocular biometric parameters, including axial length (AL), anterior chamber depth (ACD), and lens thickness (LT), were measured using the IOLMaster 700 before cycloplegia. We performed comparative analyses between the non-myopic and pseudomyopic groups, categorized based on whether the spherical equivalent (SE) before cycloplegia exceeded -0.50 diopters (D). Univariable and multivariable regression analyses were performed to control for confounding factors. Results: The final analysis included 968 eyes. The participants with pseudomyopia were more likely to be boys ( Conclusions: Among the children with mild hyperopia, pseudomyopia was more common in younger boys with a lower cycloplegic SE and higher delta SE. A thicker LT, shallower ACD, and increased AL may indicate the presence of pseudomyopia, which may provide insights into the rapid progression of myopia in children with pseudomyopia.

Indexed as

Chinese childrenOcular biometryPseudomyopiaRefraction

Identifiers

PMID39055816
PMCPMC11269864

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.