ArticleHeliyon2024
Pilot study exploring artificial intelligence for facial-image-based diagnosis of Marfan syndrome.
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Patient- and Caregiver-Informed Considerations for the Design and Implementation of Generative AI-Supported Patient-Centered Clinical Decision Support: Qualitative Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- Early diagnosis of vascular Ehlers-Danlos syndrome through AI-powered facial analysis: Results from the Montalcino Aortic Consortium.Genetics in medicine open · 2025Article
- Sulfur-Fumigated Ginger Identification Method Based on Meta-Learning for Different Devices.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Marfan Syndrome (MFS), a genetic disorder impacting connective tissue, manifests in a wide array of phenotypes which can affect numerous bodily systems, especially the thoracic aorta. The syndrome often presents distinct facial features that potentially allow for diagnostic clinical recognition. Herein, we explore the potential of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in diagnosing Marfan syndrome from ordinary facial images, as assessed by overall accuracy, F1 score, and area under the ROC curve. Methods: This study explores the utilization of Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN) for MFS identification through facial images, offering a novel, non-invasive, automated, and computerized diagnostic approach. The research examines the accuracy of Neural Networks in the diagnosis of Marfan Disease from ordinary on-line facial images. The model was trained on 80 % of 672 facial images (182 Marfan and 490 control). The other 20 % of images were used as the test set. Results: Overall accuracy was 98.5 % (0 % false positive, 2 % false negative). F1 score was 97 % for Marfan facies and 99 % for non-Marfan facies. Area under the ROC curve was 100 %. Conclusion: An Artificial Intelligence (AI) program was able to distinguish Marfan from non-Marfan facial images (from ordinary on-line photographs) with an extremely high degree of accuracy. Clinical usefulness of this program is anticipated. However, due to the limited and preliminary nature of this work, this should be viewed as only a pilot study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.