ArticleHeliyon2024
The temporal dynamics of conscious and unconscious audio-visual semantic integration.
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The role of scene context in object recognition: Timing and mechanisms.Journal of vision · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We compared the time course of cross-modal semantic effects induced by both naturalistic sounds and spoken words on the processing of visual stimuli, whether visible or suppressed form awareness through continuous flash suppression. We found that, under visible conditions, spoken words elicited audio-visual semantic effects over longer time (-1000, -500, -250 ms SOAs) than naturalistic sounds (-500, -250 ms SOAs). Performance was generally better with auditory primes, but more so with congruent stimuli. Spoken words presented in advance (-1000, -500 ms) outperformed naturalistic sounds; the opposite was true for (near-)simultaneous presentations. Congruent spoken words demonstrated superior categorization performance compared to congruent naturalistic sounds. The audio-visual semantic congruency effect still occurred with suppressed visual stimuli, although without significant variations in the temporal patterns between auditory types. These findings indicate that: 1. Semantically congruent auditory input can enhance visual processing performance, even when the visual stimulus is imperceptible to conscious awareness. 2. The temporal dynamics is contingent on the auditory types only when the visual stimulus is visible. 3. Audiovisual semantic integration requires sufficient time for processing auditory information.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.