ArticleHeliyon2024
Positive impacts of green finance on environmental protection investment: Evidence from green finance reform and innovations pilot zone.
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Can the Marketing Authorisation Holder system improve the ESG performance of pharmaceutical manufacturers?Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
- Can industry-education integration enhance enterprise employee safety and health levels?Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
After long-term development, the global economic level has improved significantly, but environmental issues generated by early extensive development seriously threaten the survival of human beings. China, in particular, urgently needs to promote sustainable development through green finance policies. For this reason, this paper regards the 2017 eight pilot zones in five provinces for green finance reform and innovations (GFRIs) as a quasi-natural experiment, and explores whether it can encourage investment in environmental protection in heavily polluting enterprises by using difference-in-differences-in-differences (DDD) model. The paper finds that: First, GFRIs can bolster investment in environmental protection in heavy polluting enterprises. The results remain consistent after several robustness checks, covering the placebo test, PSM-DID test and so on. Second, mechanism tests find that the policy promotes environmental protection investment by alleviating financing constraints and cutting financing costs. Third, heterogeneity analysis shows that the promotion effect of GFRIs on environmental protection investment is more pronounced for provinces with higher percentages of secondary industry GDP, large-scale enterprises, and enterprises with better ESG management. This paper demonstrates the beneficial influence of GFRIs on promoting the transformation of heavy polluting enterprises and provides suggestions for the improvement of such policies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.