ArticleHeliyon2024
Establishment of a predictive model of CT value in the diagnosis and differential diagnosis of pulmonary cryptococcosis.
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The Diagnostic Challenge in Pulmonary Cryptococcosis Among Immunocompetent Patients: The 'False-Negative' Serum Cryptococcal Antigen.Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To investigate the application value of computed tomography (CT) value (HU) in the diagnosis and differential diagnosis of pulmonary cryptococcosis (PC) and to construct a prediction model. Methods: Retrospective analysis of the clinical data of 73 patients who presented with nodular/mass-type occupations on lung CT and confirmed by histopathology in our hospital from January 2019 to May 2022 were divided into PC group (23 patients) and non-PC group (50 patients) according to the pathological findings, and the CT values of each patient's lung lesions were measured. The differences in age, gender, symptoms, lesion involvement in one/both lungs, lung lobe distribution, number of lesions, maximum lesion diameter (cm), lesion margin condition, and CT value results were compared between the two groups. Independent risk factors for PC were analyzed for indicators with statistically significant differences, clinical prediction models were constructed and column line plots were drawn, C (correction) indices were calculated, subject characteristics (ROC) curves were drawn, calibration curves and clinical decision curve analysis (DCA) were performed to further evaluate the predictive efficacy of the models. Results: Comparative analysis of patient data between the two groups showed statistically significant differences in central, peripheral and global CT values Conclusions: CT value measurements of lesions can be used as an independent risk factor for PC, and clinical prediction models based on the above factors are predictive for the diagnosis and differential diagnosis of PC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.