ArticleDigital health
Epidemic exposure risk assessment in digital contact tracing: A fuzzy logic approach.
Article in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- High-resolution contact data and infectious disease absenteeism in kindergarten populations.BMC infectious diseases · 2026Article
- Network-based proactive contact tracing: A pre-emptive, degree-based alerting framework for privacy-preserving COVID-19 apps.PLOS digital health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Bluetooth low energy (BLE)-based contact-tracing applications were widely used during the COVID-19 pandemic. However, the use of only the received signal strength feature for proximity calculations may not be adaptable to different virus variants or scalable for other potential epidemic diseases. Objective: This study presents a novel framework in regard to evaluating and classifying personal exposure risk that considers both contact features, which include distance and length of contact, and environment features, which include crowd size and the number of recently infected cases in the environment. The framework utilizes a fuzzy expert system that is adaptable to different virus variants. Methods: The proposed method was tested on two viruses with different close contact features, which used four membership functions and 256 fuzzy rule sets. Results: The proposed framework classified personal exposure risks into four classes, which include low, medium, high, and too high risk. The empirical results showed that the fuzzy logic-based approach reduced the number of false positive cases and demonstrated better accuracy and precision than the current BLE-only approaches. Conclusions: The proposed framework provides a more practical and adaptable method in regard to assessing exposure risks in real-world scenarios. It has the potential to be scalable and adaptable to different virus variants and other potential epidemic diseases by considering both contact and environment features. These findings may be useful in order to develop more effective digital contact-tracing applications and policies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.