Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39055745›Full record

ArticleAllergologie select2024

Procedure for a standardized preparation of skin prick test solutions for the diagnosis of occupational type I allergies in the absence of commercial extracts.

Sabine Kespohl, Robin Jost, Silke Maryska, Lena-Maria Altin, Ingrid Sander, Stefan Schülke, Kathrin E Paulus-Tremel, Andreas Bonertz, Thomas Klose, Vera Mahler and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Allergologie select, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Sabine KespohlInstitute for Prevention and Occupational Medicine of the DGUV, Ruhr-University Bochum (IPA), Bochum.
Robin JostDivision Allergology, Paul-Ehrlich-Institut, Langen, and.
Silke MaryskaInstitute for Prevention and Occupational Medicine of the DGUV, Ruhr-University Bochum (IPA), Bochum.
Lena-Maria AltinSonnenschein Apotheke, Koblenz, Germany.
Ingrid SanderInstitute for Prevention and Occupational Medicine of the DGUV, Ruhr-University Bochum (IPA), Bochum.
Stefan SchülkeDivision Allergology, Paul-Ehrlich-Institut, Langen, and.
Kathrin E Paulus-TremelDivision Allergology, Paul-Ehrlich-Institut, Langen, and.
Andreas BonertzDivision Allergology, Paul-Ehrlich-Institut, Langen, and.
Thomas KloseSonnenschein Apotheke, Koblenz, Germany.
Vera MahlerDivision Allergology, Paul-Ehrlich-Institut, Langen, and.
Monika RaulfInstitute for Prevention and Occupational Medicine of the DGUV, Ruhr-University Bochum (IPA), Bochum.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In order to ensure valid diagnostics for occupational test allergen solutions despite the ongoing reduction in the availability of commercial test extracts, a plan B was initiated for the possible production of skin prick test (SPT) solutions in public pharmacies. For important occupational allergen sources (wheat and rye, storage mites, animal epithelia, mold material) laboratory extraction methods were analyzed in comparison to pharmacy compatible extraction methods regarding protein quantity and quality in SDS-PAGE combined with silver staining. Subsequently, using the example of bovine epithelia, adapted extraction procedures as well as in-process and final product controls were transferred to a public pharmacy. Allergen sources with a high protein content, such as wheat and rye grains as well as storage mites, showed good comparability of the extractable protein quantity and protein pattern, regardless of the applied extraction method. In contrast, allergen source materials with a low total protein content, such as animal epithelia and molds, can benefit from laboratory extraction conditions such as mechanical disruption and specific buffer additives. In the qualitative protein silver staining, characteristic protein patterns were identified for each allergen source. Depending on the extraction method, only minor differences in total protein patterns were observed in animal epithelia and molds. Using source materials from two suppliers, the resulting allergen extracts displayed clear differences in protein content in storage mites and quantitative and qualitative differences in molds. A practical preparation attempt of SPT solutions in a public pharmacy was successful. SPT solutions prepared with adapted pharmacy extraction methods showed a comparable protein and Bos d 2 allergen content and equivalent qualities in the protein pattern compared to a previously available commercial SPT solution. Accordingly, it can be assumed that standardized SPT solutions with sufficient allergen quality for occupational allergen sources can be prepared in public pharmacies if certified allergen sources with appropriate protein content are available.

Indexed as

allergy diagnosisdiagnostic gapoccupational allergenspublic pharmacyqualityskin prick test solutionsstandardizationtest allergen preparation

Identifiers

PMID39055745
PMCPMC11270343

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.