Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39055743›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of pharmaceutics: X2024

Development and optimization of the Glabridin-loaded dissolving microneedle for enhanced treatment of keloid.

Juan Guo, Zhongtang Chen, Rong Huang, Dandan Tang, Yuhuan Wang, Pan Song, Liangyu Mei, Shuguang Hou, Wei Peng, Lisha He and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of pharmaceutics: X, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Juan GuoState Key Laboratory of Southwestern Chinese Medicine Resources, School of Pharmacy, School of Clinical Medicine, Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu 611137, PR China.
Zhongtang ChenState Key Laboratory of Southwestern Chinese Medicine Resources, School of Pharmacy, School of Clinical Medicine, Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu 611137, PR China.
Rong HuangState Key Laboratory of Southwestern Chinese Medicine Resources, School of Pharmacy, School of Clinical Medicine, Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu 611137, PR China.
Dandan TangState Key Laboratory of Southwestern Chinese Medicine Resources, School of Pharmacy, School of Clinical Medicine, Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu 611137, PR China.
Yuhuan WangState Key Laboratory of Southwestern Chinese Medicine Resources, School of Pharmacy, School of Clinical Medicine, Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu 611137, PR China.
Pan SongChengdu Integrated TCM & Western Medicine Hospital, Chengdu 610041, PR China.
Liangyu MeiState Key Laboratory of Southwestern Chinese Medicine Resources, School of Pharmacy, School of Clinical Medicine, Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu 611137, PR China.
Shuguang HouState Key Laboratory of Southwestern Chinese Medicine Resources, School of Pharmacy, School of Clinical Medicine, Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu 611137, PR China.
Wei PengState Key Laboratory of Southwestern Chinese Medicine Resources, School of Pharmacy, School of Clinical Medicine, Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu 611137, PR China.
Lisha HeState Key Laboratory of Southwestern Chinese Medicine Resources, School of Pharmacy, School of Clinical Medicine, Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu 611137, PR China.
Qiang RenState Key Laboratory of Southwestern Chinese Medicine Resources, School of Pharmacy, School of Clinical Medicine, Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu 611137, PR China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Glabridin (Gla) has been reported to have significant effects in scar treatment, and however, the water insolubility of Gla leads to its poor transdermal absorption ability, which affects its bioactivities. Therefore, we attempted to prepare the Gla dissolving microneedles (Gla-MN) to improve the absorbtion of Gla. After investigation of the 3 factors including the needle tip matrix concentration, the prescription concentration of backing material, and the dissolution method of Gla, we finally determined the process parameters of 10% hyaluronic acid (HA) as the needle tip and 5% polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) as the backing, according to which the Gla-MN was prepared with the good characteristics of high hardness, complete appearance and good in vitro dissolution ability. We then loaded Gla onto the microneedles and measured that the average drug loading of Gla-MN was 2.26 ± 0.11 μg/mg and the cumulative transdermal release of Gla-MN was up to 76.9% after 24 h. In addition, Gla-MN had good skin penetration properties, with Gla-MN penetrating at least 4 to 5 layers of parafilm. And the skin basically could return to normal after 4 h of piercing. Importantly, our results showed that Gla-MN had higher transdermal delivery and therapeutic effects against keloid than that of Gla at the same dosage.

Indexed as

Dissolving microneedleGlabridinKeloidPI3K/Akt signalingTGF-β1/α-SMATransdermal absorption

Identifiers

PMID39055743
PMCPMC11269287

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.