Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39055716›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in immunology2024

Prognostic significance of soluble PD-L1 in prostate cancer.

Margarita Zvirble, Zilvinas Survila, Paulius Bosas, Neringa Dobrovolskiene, Agata Mlynska, Gintaras Zaleskis, Jurgita Jursenaite, Dainius Characiejus, Vita Pasukoniene

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Margarita ZvirbleLaboratory of Immunology, National Cancer Institute, Vilnius, Lithuania.
Zilvinas SurvilaInstitute of Biosciences, Life Sciences Center, Vilnius University, Vilnius, Lithuania.
Paulius BosasDepartment of Oncourology, National Cancer Institute, Vilnius, Lithuania.
Neringa DobrovolskieneLaboratory of Immunology, National Cancer Institute, Vilnius, Lithuania.
Agata MlynskaLaboratory of Immunology, National Cancer Institute, Vilnius, Lithuania.
Gintaras ZaleskisDepartment of Immunology and Bioelectrochemistry, State Research Institute Centre for Innovative Medicine, Vilnius, Lithuania.
Jurgita JursenaiteDepartment of Immunology and Bioelectrochemistry, State Research Institute Centre for Innovative Medicine, Vilnius, Lithuania.
Dainius CharaciejusDepartment of Immunology and Bioelectrochemistry, State Research Institute Centre for Innovative Medicine, Vilnius, Lithuania.
Vita PasukonieneLaboratory of Immunology, National Cancer Institute, Vilnius, Lithuania.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of this study was to assess the role of sPD-L1 and sPD-1 as potential biomarkers in prostate cancer (PCa). The association of the values of these soluble proteins were correlated to the clinical data: stage of disease, Gleason score, biochemical recurrence etc. For a comprehensive study, the relationship between sPD-L1 and sPD-1 and circulating immune cells was further investigated. Methods: A total of 88 patients with pT2 and pT3 PCa diagnosis and 41 heathy men were enrolled. Soluble sPD-L1 and sPD-1 levels were measured in plasma by ELISA method. Immunophenotyping was performed by flow cytometry analysis. Results: Our study's findings demonstrate that PCa patients had higher levels of circulating sPD-L1 and sPD-1 comparing to healthy controls (p < 0.001). We found a statistically significant (p < 0.05) relationship between improved progression free survival and lower initial sPD-L1 values. Furthermore, patients with a lower sPD-1/sPD-L1 ratio were associated with a higher probability of disease progression (p < 0.05). Additionally, a significant (p < 0.05) association was discovered between higher Gleason scores and elevated preoperative sPD-L1 levels and between sPD-1 and advanced stage of disease (p < 0.05). A strong correlation (p < 0.05), between immunosuppressive CD4+CD25+FoxP3+ regulatory T cells and baseline sPD-L1 was observed in patients with unfavorable postoperative course of the disease, supporting the idea that these elements influence each other in cancer progression. In addition to the postoperative drop in circulating PD-L1, the inverse relationship (p < 0.05), between the percentage of M-MDSC and sPD-L1 in patients with BCR suggests that M-MDSC is not a source of sPD-L1 in PCa patients. Conclusion: Our findings suggest the potential of sPD-L1 as a promising prognostic marker in prostate cancer.

Indexed as

B7-H1 AntigenBiomarkers, TumorProstatic NeoplasmsAgedHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm GradingNeoplasm StagingPrognosisB7-H1 AntigenBiomarkers, TumorCD274 protein, humanbiomarkersimmune cellsprognosis predictionprostate cancersoluble PD-L1 and PD-1

Identifiers

PMID39055716
PMCPMC11269106

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.