Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39055694›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in medicine2024

Patient-reported assessment of compassion in Spanish: a systematic review.

Ana Soto-Rubio, Carmen Picazo, Beatriz Gil-Juliá, Yolanda Andreu-Vaillo, Marian Pérez-Marín, Shane Sinclair

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ana Soto-RubioDevelopmental and Education Psychology Department, Faculty of Psychology and Speech Therapy, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain.
Carmen PicazoPsychology and Sociology Department, University of Zaragoza, Zaragoza, Spain.
Beatriz Gil-JuliáPersonality, Assessment, and Psychological Treatments Department, Faculty of Psychology and Speech Therapy, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain.
Yolanda Andreu-VailloPersonality, Assessment, and Psychological Treatments Department, Faculty of Psychology and Speech Therapy, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain.
Marian Pérez-MarínPersonality, Assessment, and Psychological Treatments Department, Faculty of Psychology and Speech Therapy, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain.
Shane SinclairCompassion Research Lab, Faculty of Nursing, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aims and objectives: This systematic review aims to: (1) explore which tools have been used in Spanish to measure compassion; (2) know which of these tools could be used to assess compassion in healthcare settings from the perspective of patients; (3) evaluate the quality of these patient-reported measures in Spanish contexts; and (4) determine which of these instruments would be best suited to be used in healthcare settings. Background: Compassion has been recognized as a fundamental dimension of quality healthcare. Methods: Several scientific databases were consulted for relevant records published up to December 16 Results and conclusions: while existing instruments, validated in Spanish, allow for the measurement of self-compassion or compassion to others, there are no valid and reliable measures currently available in Spanish to measure patient-reported compassion. Relevance to clinical practice: In order to ensure and promote compassion in the health care context, it is essential to have a valid and reliable tool to measure this construct in a patient-informed way, and this is currently not possible in the Spanish-speaking context because of the lack of such an instrument in Spanish.

Indexed as

assessmentcompassioncompassionate carehealth caremeasurepatient reported outcome measure (PROM)Spanishsystematic review

Identifiers

PMID39055694
PMCPMC11270590

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.