ArticleJournal of infection prevention2024
Examining the impact and response to an outbreak of carbapenemase-producing
Article in Journal of infection prevention, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Carbapenemase-producing Methods: Routine surveillance screening (rectal swabs) of babies on the NU identified a potential cluster of CPE carriage. Samples were sent to a reference laboratory for confirmatory testing. Environmental screening and cot mapping were undertaken to determine movements of babies within the unit. Regular audits of cleaning standards, hand hygiene, and maternal hygiene when expressing breast milk were carried out. Results: The outbreak lasted 19 weeks. During the outbreak, there were 360 admissions, with 11 babies being colonised with the outbreak strain. Once the outbreak was declared, there were enhanced Infection Prevention and Control (IPC) precautions (including increased environmental and equipment cleaning frequency). CPE screening frequency was increased and cot capacity was reduced. Hand hygiene compliance improved from 92% at the start of the outbreak to 100% by its close. Cleaning standards remained compliant. Maternal hygiene standards varied from 78% to 100%, but no cross-infection links were identified. Environmental screening was negative. No route of cross-infection was identified. Notably, no babies developed invasive CPE infection. Conclusion: This is the first report of a CPE outbreak in a UK NU. Although no specific mode of cross-transmission was identified and the outbreak's end cannot be attributed to any single intervention, the bundle of interventions proved successful after a 5-month period.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.