Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39055638›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of transgender health2024

Ethical and methodological challenges conducting participative research with transgender and gender-diverse young people: a systematic review.

Julie Servais, Bram Vanhoutte, Herby Maddy, Isabelle Godin

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of transgender health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Facilitators and Barriers to Research Participation Among Transgender and Gender-Diverse Youth: A Youth-Engaged Qualitative Study.The Journal of adolescent health : official publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Ensuring an inclusive, trans-led future for the field of trans health.International journal of transgender health · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Julie ServaisSchool of Public Health, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7002-6703
Bram VanhoutteSchool of Public Health, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8032-9214
Herby MaddyFaculty of Medicine, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1719-4564
Isabelle GodinSchool of Public Health, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5121-9991

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Research with transgender and gender-diverse (TGD) young people is essential to understand their experiences and to be able to propose, implement and adapt 'services' in the broadest sense to meet their needs. However, research outside clinical settings on current experiences and needs of youth under the age of 18 is limited which hinders the development of knowledge on TGD, as well as the development of research informed support practices. Acquiring parental consent for participatory research may present ethical and logistical difficulties, as it could jeopardize the safety, well-being, or confidentiality of adolescent participants. This creates a tension between the adolescent's right to autonomy, privacy, freedom, and all aspects related to the consent of the underage on the one hand, and the parents' right to protect their child on the other hand. This review aims to identify the methodological and ethical challenges associated with participatory research with transgender and gender-diverse young people. Methods: We systematically searched bibliometric databases for studies published between 2006 and 2022 and included 4 main conceptual groups: transgender and gender non-conforming, adolescence, qualitative research (including participatory research) and consent. This review was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42022368360) in November 2022. Results: Of the 3,794 articles initially identified, 291 met the inclusion criteria and 48 were examined. The selected studies were analyzed in the light of four main ethical tensions: involving parents or a trusted person in the consent gathering process, ensuring the protection and safety of young people while respecting confidentiality, and ensuring that spaces are created for transgender and gender-diverse young people to express themselves freely as part of an empowering research process. At the same time, several methodological challenges concerning public and stakeholder participation and recruitment, data collection and analysis as well as research integrity emerged from the selected studies. Conclusion & implications: The existing literature of participatory research involving young transgender and gender-diverse individuals underscores the intricate and conflicting aspects, especially concerning power dynamics, empowerment, and the researcher's role. The relevance of these findings extends across various legal frameworks and is applicable to multiple contexts and countries.

Indexed as

ethicsgender-diverseparticipatory researchsystematic reviewtransgenderyouth

Identifiers

PMID39055638
PMCPMC11268261

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.