ArticleCureus2024
Childbirth Experience and Pain Control: Expectation, Satisfaction, and Analgesia Myths.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Pharmacological pain relief and women´s birth experience: a systematic review.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2025Pooled it
- Article
- The Impact of Epidural Analgesia on the Dynamics of Labor and Perinatal Outcomes in Nulliparous Women: A Prospective Cohort Study.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Article
- Effects of Nursing Interventions During Delivery on Pain Relief and Labor Progression in Vaginal Deliveries.Cureus · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIn our days, increasing importance has been given to maternal satisfaction as a quality indicator in healthcare services. A positive childbirth experience should meet a woman's personal and sociocultural beliefs and expectations in every setting. This study aimed to evaluate childbirth experience regarding expectations, satisfaction, and myths around epidural analgesia. METHODOLOGY: A cross-sectional survey designed was carried out in the Obstetric Department of a public hospital in Madeira-Portugal. A well-structured questionnaire was applied to 101 post-partum women covering aspects such as sociodemographic details, childbirth expectations, overall satisfaction, and prevailing myths. IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 26.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY) was used for data analysis.
resultsFrom the total of 101 participants, 32 (31%) women belonged to the 31-35 age group. Among the respondents, 58 (57%) had attained a high school diploma. The results showed that there was a positive experience with childbirth; out of the total women, 79 (78%) considered it exceeded their expectations. The majority of pregnant women (93, 92%) received neuraxial analgesia for labor, reporting the experience as good or excellent. The overall satisfaction related to the birth experience was good or excellent for 88 (87%) women. Regarding the myths, education level was significantly associated with the myth
conclusionsThe result of this study proves that, despite the high level of satisfaction with the labor and delivery experience found in our maternity unit, satisfaction remains a complex and dynamic phenomenon.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.