Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39055388›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in nutrition2024

Toward a science-based classification of processed foods to support meaningful research and effective health policies.

Paula R Trumbo, Rachel Bleiweiss-Sande, Jessica K Campbell, Eric Decker, Adam Drewnowski, John W Erdman, Mario G Ferruzzi, Ciaran G Forde, Michael J Gibney, Julie M Hess and 8 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in nutrition, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Reply to Vella and Pai.European journal of clinical nutrition · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Paula R TrumboPaula R. Trumbo Consulting, Mount Pleasant, SC, United States.
Rachel Bleiweiss-SandeSchool of Health Sciences, Liberty University, Lynchburg, VA, United States.
Jessica K CampbellBell Institute of Health and Nutrition, General Mills, Golden Valley, MN, United States.
Eric DeckerDepartment of Food Science, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA, United States.
Adam DrewnowskiDepartment of Epidemiology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States.
John W ErdmanDepartment of Food Science and Human Nutrition, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana-Champaign, IL, United States.
Mario G FerruzziArkansas Children's Nutrition Center, Department of Pediatrics, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, United States.
Ciaran G FordeDivision of Human Nutrition and Health, Wageningen University, Wageningen, Netherlands.
Michael J GibneyInstitute of Food and Health, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
Julie M HessUSDA-ARS Grand Forks Human Nutrition Research Center, Grand Forks, ND, United States.
David M KlurfeldDepartment of Applied Health Science, Indiana University School of Public Health-Bloomington, Bloomington, IN, United States.
Marie E LatulippeInstitute for the Advancement of Food and Nutrition Sciences, Washington, DC, United States.
Lauren E O'ConnorBeltsville Human Nutrition Research Center, Agricultural Research Service, United States Department of Agriculture, Beltsville, MD, United States.
Kristin J ReimersConagra Brands, Chicago, IL, United States.
Barbara J RollsDepartment of Nutritional Sciences, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, United States.
Jackie SchulzGriffith Foods, Inc., Alsip, IL, United States.
Connie WeaverCollege of Health and Human Services, School of Exercise and Nutritional Sciences, San Diego State University, San Diego, CA, United States.
Lynn YuThe Kraft Heinz Company, Chicago, IL, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Processed foods have been part of the American diet for decades, with key roles in providing a safe, available, affordable, and nutritious food supply. The USDA Food Guides beginning in 1916 and the US Dietary Guidelines for Americans (DGA) since 1980 have included various types of commonly consumed processed foods (e.g., heated, fermented, dried) as part of their recommendations. However, there are multiple classification systems based on "level" of food processing, and additional evidence is needed to establish the specific properties of foods classified as "highly" or "ultra"-processed (HPF/UPFs). Importantly, many foods are captured under HPF/UPF definitions, ranging from ready-to-eat fortified whole grain breakfast cereals to sugar-sweetened beverages and baked goods. The consequences of implementing dietary guidance to limit all intake of foods currently classified as HPF/UPF may require additional scrutiny to evaluate the impact on consumers' ability to meet daily nutrient recommendations and to access affordable food, and ultimately, on health outcomes. Based on a meeting held by the Institute for the Advancement of Food and Nutrition Sciences in May 2023, this paper provides perspectives on the broad array of foods classified as HPF/UPFs based on processing and formulation, including contributions to nutrient intake and dietary patterns, food acceptability, and cost. Characteristics of foods classified as UPF/HPFs are considered, including the roles and safety approval of food additives and the effect of food processing on the food matrix. Finally, this paper identifies information gaps and research needs to better understand how the processing of food affects nutrition and health outcomes.

Indexed as

consumer acceptabilityformulationnutrient adequacysafetyultraprocessed foods

Identifiers

PMID39055388
PMCPMC11271201

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.