Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39055298›Full record

ArticleJournal of International Society of Preventive & Community Dentistry

Biomarkers of Orthodontic Patients After Use of 1% Brazilian Red Propolis Toothpaste: A Randomized Clinical Study.

Mônica do Amaral Silva, Lídia Audrey Rocha Valadas, Guilherme Antônio Lopes de Oliveira, Edilson Martins Rodrigues Neto, Emmanuel Arraes de Alencar Júnior, Patricia Leal Dantas Lobo, Thereza Cristina Farias Botelho Dantas, Mary Anne Medeiros Bandeira, Marta Maria de França Fonteles, Gandhi Radis Baptista

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of International Society of Preventive & Community Dentistry. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Mônica do Amaral SilvaSchool of Pharmacy, Dentistry and Nursing, Federal University of Ceara, Fortaleza, Brazil.
Lídia Audrey Rocha ValadasSchool of Pharmacy, Dentistry and Nursing, Federal University of Ceara, Fortaleza, Brazil.
Guilherme Antônio Lopes de OliveiraCollege of Pharmacy, Cristo College of Piauí, Piripiri, Brazil.
Edilson Martins Rodrigues NetoSchool of Pharmacy, Dentistry and Nursing, Federal University of Ceara, Fortaleza, Brazil.
Emmanuel Arraes de Alencar JúniorSchool of Pharmacy, Dentistry and Nursing, Federal University of Ceara, Fortaleza, Brazil.
Patricia Leal Dantas LoboSchool of Pharmacy, Dentistry and Nursing, Federal University of Ceara, Fortaleza, Brazil.
Thereza Cristina Farias Botelho DantasPaulo Picanço College of Dentistry, Fortaleza, Brazil.
Mary Anne Medeiros BandeiraSchool of Pharmacy, Dentistry and Nursing, Federal University of Ceara, Fortaleza, Brazil.
Marta Maria de França FontelesSchool of Pharmacy, Dentistry and Nursing, Federal University of Ceara, Fortaleza, Brazil.
Gandhi Radis BaptistaSchool of Pharmacy, Dentistry and Nursing, Federal University of Ceara, Fortaleza, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aim: To evaluate the salivary biomarkers and plaque index after a treatment with a propolis-contained toothpaste. Materials and Methods: This is a longitudinal, randomized, double-blind study where 76 participants were randomized into two groups: Group I: Fluoridated Red Propolis toothpaste; Group II: Fluoridated toothpaste. The participants were selected in a municipality without fluoridated public water. All participants received standardized oral hygiene instructions from the same instructor for 3 daily brushings (after breakfast, after lunch, and before bed) for a period of 2 min; Saliva samples were collected before (D0) and after 28 days (D28) of treatment for analysis of pH and total protein, amylase, and IL-10. Saliva was collected in the initial consultation and on return, totaling two collections. All samples were collected under the same conditions, by the same operator and between 9:00 AM and 11:00 AM in order to minimize the influence of circadian rhythm on salivary flow. Results: On D0 and D28, the various treatments had no effect on total salivary proteins (G1: Conclusions: After 28 days of using the toothpastes, there were no changes in the amylase, pH, or total protein indicators. After 28 days, there was a decrease in the propolis group's IL-10 dose and plaque index.

Indexed as

BiofilmBiomarkerPropolisSaliva

Identifiers

PMID39055298
PMCPMC11268535

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.