ArticleFood science & nutrition2024
Fast detection of moisture content and freshness for loquats using optical fiber spectroscopy.
Article in Food science & nutrition, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Predicting Porosity in Grain Compression Experiments Using Random Forest and Metaheuristic Optimization Algorithms.Food science & nutrition · 2025Article
- Fast detection of moisture content and freshness for loquats using optical fiber spectroscopy.Food science & nutrition · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Detection of the moisture content (MC) and freshness for loquats is crucial for achieving optimal taste and economic efficiency. Traditional methods for evaluating the MC and freshness of loquats have disadvantages such as destructive sampling and time-consuming. To investigate the feasibility of rapid and non-destructive detection of the MC and freshness for loquats, optical fiber spectroscopy in the range of 200-1000 nm was used in this study. The full spectra were pre-processed using standard normal variate method, and then, the effective wavelengths were selected using competitive adaptive weighting sampling (CARS) and random frog algorithms. Based on the selected effective wavelengths, prediction models for MC were developed using partial least squares regression (PLSR), multiple linear regression, extreme learning machine, and back-propagation neural network. Furthermore, freshness level discrimination models were established using simplified k nearest neighbor, support vector machine (SVM), and partial least squares discriminant analysis. Regarding the prediction models, the CARS-PLSR model performed relatively better than the other models for predicting the MC, with
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.