ReviewImmuno-oncology technology2024
Regional and intratumoral adoptive T-cell therapy.
Review in Immuno-oncology technology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Adoptive T-cell therapies in the clinic.Bioengineering & translational medicine · 2026Review
- [Overview of CAR-T cell therapy : What the radiologist should know].Radiologie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2026Review
- Autocrine activity of engineered IL-33 mRNA enhances adoptive T-cell therapy for peritoneal carcinomatosis and synergizes with IL-12 mRNA.Theranostics · 2026Article
- The science of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TIL): perspectives from the SITC Surgery Committee.Journal for immunotherapy of cancer · 2025Review
- Prdm12 governs an epigenetic checkpoint linking neuroimmune cross-talk to CD8Science advances · 2025Article
- Potentiating intratumoral therapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors: shifting the paradigm of multimodality therapeutics.Immuno-oncology technology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Adoptive T-cell therapies (ACTs) including tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes and engineered T cells (transgenic T-cell receptor and chimeric antigen receptor T cells), have made an important impact in the field of cancer treatment over the past years. Most of these therapies are typically administered systemically in approaches that facilitate the elimination of hematologic malignancies. Therapeutical efficacy against solid tumors, however, with the exception of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes against melanoma, remains limited due to several barriers preventing lymphocyte access to the tumor bed. Building upon the experience of regional administration in other immunotherapies, the regional administration of adoptive cell therapies is being assessed to overcome this challenge, granting a first round of access of the transferred T cells to the tumor niche and thereby ensuring their activation and expansion. Intralesional and intracavitary routes of delivery have been tested with promising antitumor objective responses in preclinical and clinical studies. Additionally, several strategies are being developed to further improve T-cell activity after reinfusing them back to the patient such as combinations with other immunotherapy agents or direct engineering of the transferred T cells, achieving long-term immune memory. Clinical trials testing different regional adoptive T-cell therapies are ongoing but some issues related to methodology of administration and correct selection of the target antigen to avoid on-target/off-tumor side-effects need to be further evaluated and improved. Herein, we discuss the current preclinical and clinical landscape of intratumoral and locoregional delivery of adoptive T-cell therapies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.