ArticleMolecular medicine reports2024
The role and mechanism of action of miR‑92a in endothelial cell autophagy.
Article in Molecular medicine reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cardiovascular diseases in the elderly: possibilities for modulating autophagy using non-coding RNAs.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2025Review
- A miRNA cocktail orchestrates coordinated cellular responses to promote diabetic wound healing.Burns & trauma · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Although microRNAs (miRNAs/miRs) serve a significant role in the autophagy of vascular endothelial cells (ECs), the effect of miR‑92a on the autophagy of ECs is currently unclear. Therefore, the present study aimed to investigate the impact of miR‑92a on autophagy in ECs and the underlying molecular processes that control this biological activity. Firstly, an autophagy model of EA.hy926 cells was generated via treatment with the autophagy inducer rapamycin (rapa‑EA.hy926 cells). The expression levels of miR‑92a were then detected by reverse transcription‑quantitative PCR, and the effect of miR‑92a expression on the autophagic activity of rapa‑EA.hy926 cells was studied by overexpressing or inhibiting miR‑92a. The level of autophagy was evaluated by western blot analysis, immunofluorescence staining and transmission electron microscopy. Dual‑luciferase reporter assays were used to confirm the interaction between miR‑92a and FOXO3. The results demonstrated that the expression levels of miR‑92a were decreased in the rapa‑EA.hy926 cell autophagy model. Furthermore, overexpression and inhibition of miR‑92a revealed that upregulation of miR‑92a in these cells inhibited autophagy, whereas miR‑92a knockdown promoted it. It was also confirmed that miR‑92a directly bound to the 3'‑untranslated region of the autophagy‑related gene FOXO3 and reduced its expression. In conclusion, the present study suggested that miR‑92a inhibits autophagy activity in EA.hy926 cells by targeting FOXO3.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.