Trial reportPediatrics2024
Early Childhood Care Coordination Through 211: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
Trial report in Pediatrics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Sustained Effectiveness of a 211 Call Center With Early Childhood Care Coordination.Pediatrics · 2025Trial
- What Does Care Coordination Do? Profiling a Large Telephone-based 211 Program Serving Young Children.Academic pediatrics · 2026Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
objectivesEarly intervention services can improve outcomes for children with developmental delays. Health care providers, however, often struggle to ensure timely referrals and services. We tested the effectiveness of telephone-based early childhood developmental care coordination through 211 LA, a health and human services call center serving Los Angeles County, in increasing referral and enrollment in services.
methodsIn partnership with 4 clinic systems, we recruited and randomly assigned children aged 12 to 42 months with upcoming well-child visits and without a known developmental delay, to intervention versus usual care. All children received developmental screening and usual clinic care. Intervention children also received telephone connection to a 211 LA early childhood care coordinator who made referrals and conducted follow-up. Primary outcomes at a 6-month follow-up included parent-reported referral and enrollment in developmental services. Secondary outcomes included referral and enrollment in early care and education (ECE). Logistic regression models were used to estimate the odds of outcomes, adjusted for key covariates.
resultsOf 565 families (282 intervention, 283 control), 512 (90.6%) provided follow-up data. Among all participants, more intervention than control children were referred to (25% vs 16%, adjusted odds ratio [AOR] 2.25, P = .003) and enrolled in (15% vs 9%, AOR 2.35, P = .008) ≥1 service, and more intervention than control children were referred to (58% vs 15%, AOR 9.06, P < .001) and enrolled in (26% vs 10%, AOR 3.75, P < .001) ECE.
conclusionsTelephone-based care coordination through 211 LA is effective in connecting young children to developmental services and ECE, offering a potentially scalable solution for gaps and disparities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.