Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39054690›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of rural health : official journal of the American Rural Health Association and the National Rural Health Care Association2025

Expanding the opioid use disorder medication treatment workforce in rural communities through the RCORP initiative.

C Holly A Andrilla, Sara C Woolcock, Kathleen Meyers, Davis G Patterson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of rural health : official journal of the American Rural Health Association and the National Rural Health Care Association, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Expanding the opioid use disorder medication treatment workforce in rural communities through the RCORP initiative.The Journal of rural health : official journal of the American Rural Health Association and the National Rural Health Care Association · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

C Holly A AndrillaDepartment of Family Medicine, WWAMI Rural Health Research Center, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9678-7933
Sara C WoolcockDepartment of Family Medicine, WWAMI Rural Health Research Center, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington, USA.ORCID 0009-0009-8236-7810
Kathleen MeyersJBS International, Rockville, Maryland, USA.
Davis G PattersonDepartment of Family Medicine, WWAMI Rural Health Research Center, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1795-0956

Funding

Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA)US Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) U3CRH33332
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe Rural Communities Opioid Response Program (RCORP) was funded to help rural communities improve prevention, treatment, and recovery services for Opioid Use Disorder (OUD), including increasing the supply of clinicians with a Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) waiver to prescribe buprenorphine, which was required before 2023. This research investigates the impact of RCORP funding on the supply of DEA-waivered clinicians in rural communities.

methodsWe used 2017-2022 DEA lists of waivered clinicians to assign clinicians to US counties. Using RCORP service area data, we classified rural counties as either being served by an RCORP grantee or not. We calculated the number of counties in each category with a waivered clinician, clinician-to-population ratios, and treatment slot-to-population ratios.

findingsIn 2017, 3.7% more of RCORP funded counties had a waivered clinician than non-RCORP counties. RCORP counties also had 1.2 more waivered clinicians per 100,000 population and 57.5 more treatment slots per 100,000 population compared to non-RCORP counties. From 2017 to 2022, these differences more than doubled. The supply of waivered clinicians varied across Census Divisions. In most Census Divisions, a greater percentage of RCORP counties had a waivered clinician as well as more waivered clinicians and treatment slots per population, except for the Pacific Census Division, which had more clinicians and treatment slots per population in non-RCORP counties.

conclusionsStudy findings suggest that federal investments to expand rural OUD patients' access to care may have been successful, but only if increases in clinician supply translate into greater provision of OUD treatment.

Indexed as

Opiate Substitution TreatmentOpioid-Related DisordersRural PopulationBuprenorphineHealth WorkforceHumansRural Health ServicesUnited StatesBuprenorphinebuprenorphinemedication‐assisted treatmentopioid use disorderRCORPrural health

Identifiers

PMID39054690
PMCPMC11635396

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.