ReviewBrain : a journal of neurology2024
Prenatal assessment of brain malformations on neuroimaging: an expert panel review.
Review in Brain : a journal of neurology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- What you see is not always what you get-MRI-based ganglionic eminence volumetry challenges subjective assessment in CNS anomalies.European radiology · 2026Article
- The Value of Transvaginal Neurosonography in the Detection of Fetal Ganglionic Eminence Abnormalities.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Prenatal diagnosis of infratentorial anomalies: ultrasound, fetal MRI, and implications for counseling.Pediatric radiology · 2026Review
- A novel PTEN variant causing hemimegalencephaly and focal nodular heterotopias in the developing human brain.Epilepsia · 2026Article
- Genetic landscape and phenotypic correlations of lissencephaly: prenatal and postnatal insights.Brain communications · 2026Article
- Neurodevelopmental Changes in the Guinea Pig Brain Caused by Time-Limited Complete Vitamin C Deprivation.Nutrients · 2025Article
- Conditional deep generative normative modeling for structural and developmental anomaly detection in the fetal brain.NeuroImage · 2025Article
- Fetal malformations of cortical development: review and clinical guidance.Brain : a journal of neurology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
22 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Brain malformations represent a heterogeneous group of abnormalities of neural morphogenesis, often associated with aberrations of neuronal connectivity and brain volume. Prenatal detection of brain malformations requires a clear understanding of embryology and developmental morphology through the various stages of gestation. This expert panel review is written with the central aim of providing an easy-to-understand road map to improve prenatal detection and characterization of structural malformations based on the current understanding of normal and aberrant brain development. For every developmental stage, the utility of each available neuroimaging modality, including prenatal multiplanar neuro sonography, anatomical MRI and advanced MRI techniques, as well as further insights from post-mortem imaging, has been highlighted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.