Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39054503›Full record

ArticleSystematic reviews2024

Employment and mental health in the working age population: a protocol for a systematic review of longitudinal studies.

Fiona Aanesen, Rigmor C Berg, Ingrid Løken Jørgensen, Benedicte Mohr, Karin Proper, Lars-Kristian Lunde

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Systematic reviews, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. Anxiety disorders: a cross-sectional study of clinical and biological associations.Journal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996) · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Fiona AanesenNational Institute of Occupational Health, PO Box 5330 Majorstuen, Oslo, 0304, Norway. fionaaanes@hotmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-3284-8060
Rigmor C BergNorwegian Institute of Public Health, PO Box 222 Skøyen, Oslo, 0213, Norway.
Ingrid Løken JørgensenNational Institute of Occupational Health, PO Box 5330 Majorstuen, Oslo, 0304, Norway.
Benedicte MohrNational Institute of Occupational Health, PO Box 5330 Majorstuen, Oslo, 0304, Norway.
Karin ProperDutch National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, PO Box 1, 3720 BA, Bilthoven, The Netherlands.
Lars-Kristian LundeNational Institute of Occupational Health, PO Box 5330 Majorstuen, Oslo, 0304, Norway.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEmployment provides economic security, a social network, and is important for self-identity. A review published by van der Noordt and colleagues in 2014 showed that employment was beneficial for depression and general mental health. However, an updated synthesis including research published in the last decade is lacking. In the planned review, we aim to update, critically assess, and synthesise the current evidence of the association between paid employment (excluding precarious employment) and common mental health outcomes (depression, anxiety, and psychological distress) among the working age population in the labour force.

methodsWe will follow recommended guidelines for conducting and reporting systematic reviews. Four electronic databases (MEDLINE, Embase, APA PsycINFO, and Web of Science) will be searched from 2012, using appropriate MeSH terms and text words related to our inclusion criteria. We will screen the records against predefined eligibility criteria, first by title and abstract using the priority screening function in EPPI-Reviewer, before proceeding to full-text screening. Only studies investigating the longitudinal relationship between employment and common mental health outcomes will be included. We will search for grey literature in OpenAlex and conduct backward and forward citation searches of included studies. The methodological quality of the included studies will be assessed using the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool (RoB 2), Risk Of Bias In Non-randomised Studies of Interventions (ROBINS-I), or the Newcastle-Ottawa scale (NOS). We will conduct a narrative review and, if possible following pre-set criteria, conduct random-effects meta-analyses to estimate the pooled effect of employment on depression, anxiety, and psychological distress, across the included studies. DISCUSSION: An updated review of the association between non-precarious employment and mental health outcomes is needed. In the planned review, we will assess the quality of the included studies and synthesise the results across studies to make them easily accessible to policy makers and researchers. The results from the review can be used to aid in policy decisions and guide future research priorities. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42023405919.

Indexed as

EmploymentMental HealthAnxietyDepressionHumansLongitudinal StudiesResearch DesignSystematic Reviews as TopicAnxietyDepressionEmployment transitionMeta-analysisNarrative synthesisPsychological distressRe-employmentSystematic reviewUnemploymentWork

Identifiers

PMID39054503
PMCPMC11274751

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.