Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39054491›Full record

Trial reportBMC cancer2024

Pembrolizumab plus either epacadostat or placebo for cisplatin-ineligible urothelial carcinoma: results from the ECHO-307/KEYNOTE-672 study.

Andrea Necchi, Michiel S Van der Heijden, Dmytro Trukhin, Avivit Peer, Howard Gurney, Boris Y Alekseev, Francis X Parnis, Raya Leibowitz, Maria De Santis, Petros Grivas and 6 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled TrialClinical Trial, Phase IIIMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC cancer, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03361865 (A Phase 3 Randomized, Double-Blind Trial of Pembrolizumab), which is not on this map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03361865 phase3completednot on this map

A Phase 3 Randomized, Double-Blind Trial of Pembrolizumab (MK-3475) in Combination With Epacadostat (INCB024360) or Placebo in Participants With Cisplatin-ineligible Urothelial Carcinoma (KEYNOTE-672/ECHO-307)

TypeinterventionalSponsorIncyte CorporationRan2017 to 2020Enrolled93ConditionsUC (Urothelial Cancer)ArmsPembrolizumab, Epacadostat, Placebo
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Immunity and Beyond: Emerging Roles of Monocytes and Macrophages in Cancer.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2026
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Andrea NecchiVita-Salute San Raffaele University Milan, Milan, Italy. necchi.andrea@hsr.it.
Michiel S Van der HeijdenThe Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Dmytro TrukhinOdessa Regional Oncological Dispensary, Odessa, Ukraine.
Avivit PeerRambam Health Care Center, Haifa, Israel.
Howard GurneyMacquarie University, Sydney, Australia.
Boris Y AlekseevPA Hertsen Moscow Cancer Research Institute, Moscow, Russia.
Francis X ParnisAdelaide Cancer Centre, Kurralta Park, Australia.
Raya LeibowitzOncology Institute, Shamir Medical Center, Be'er yaakov, Israel.
Maria De SantisDepartment of Urology, Charité Universitätsmedizin, Berlin, Germany.
Petros GrivasUniversity of Washington, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Jason ClarkIncyte Corporation, Wilmington, Delaware, USA.
Mihaela MunteanuIncyte Corporation, Wilmington, Delaware, USA.
Ritesh KatariaMerck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, USA.
Calvin JiaMerck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, USA.
Arjun V Balar *Laura and Isaac Perlmutter Cancer Center, NYU Langone Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.
Ronald de Wit *Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIndoleamine 2,3- dioxygenase 1 (IDO1) is an immunosuppressive enzyme that has been correlated with shorter disease-specific survival in patients with urothelial carcinoma (UC). IDO1 may counteract the antitumor effects of immune checkpoint inhibitors. Epacadostat is a potent and highly selective inhibitor of IDO1. In the phase I/II ECHO-202/KEYNOTE-037 study, epacadostat plus pembrolizumab resulted in a preliminary objective response rate (ORR) of 35% in a cohort of patients with advanced UC.

methodsECHO-307/KEYNOTE-672 was a double-blinded, randomized, phase III study. Eligible adults had confirmed locally advanced/unresectable or metastatic UC of the urinary tract and were ineligible to receive cisplatin-based chemotherapy. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive epacadostat (100 mg twice daily) plus pembrolizumab (200 mg every 3 weeks) or placebo plus pembrolizumab for up to 35 pembrolizumab infusions. The primary endpoint was investigator-assessed ORR per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (version 1.1).

resultsA total of 93 patients were randomized (epacadostat plus pembrolizumab, n = 44; placebo plus pembrolizumab, n = 49). Enrollment was stopped early due to emerging data from the phase III ECHO-301/KEYNOTE-252 study. The median duration of follow-up was 64 days in both arms. Based on all available data at cutoff, ORR (unconfirmed) was 31.8% (95% CI, 22.46-55.24%) for epacadostat plus pembrolizumab and 24.5% (95% CI, 15.33-43.67%) for placebo plus pembrolizumab. Circulating kynurenine levels numerically increased from C1D1 to C2D1 in the placebo-plus-pembrolizumab arm and decreased in the epacadostat-plus-pembrolizumab arm. Epacadostat-plus-pembrolizumab combination treatment was well tolerated with a safety profile similar to the placebo arm. Treatment discontinuations due to treatment-related adverse events were more frequent with epacadostat (11.6% vs. 4.1%).

conclusionsTreatment with epacadostat plus pembrolizumab resulted in a similar ORR and safety profile as placebo plus pembrolizumab in cisplatin-ineligible patients with previously untreated locally advanced/unresectable or metastatic UC. At a dose of 100 mg twice daily, epacadostat did not appear to completely normalize circulating kynurenine levels when administered with pembrolizumab. Larger studies with longer follow-up and possibly testing higher doses of epacadostat, potentially in different therapy settings, may be warranted.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03361865, retrospectively registered December 5, 2017.

Indexed as

Antibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsCisplatinSulfonamidesUrologic NeoplasmsUrotheliumAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCarcinoma, Transitional CellDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansIndoleamine-Pyrrole 2,3,-DioxygenaseMaleMiddle AgedAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedCisplatinepacadostatIndoleamine-Pyrrole 2,3,-DioxygenaseOximespembrolizumabSulfonamidesEpacadostatIDO1Immune checkpoint inhibitionImmunotherapyPD1PD-L1PembrolizumabRandomized controlled studyUrinary tract neoplasmsUrothelial carcinoma

Identifiers

PMID39054491
PMCPMC11270764

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.