Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39054485›Full record

Trial reportBMC cancer2024

Epacadostat plus pembrolizumab versus placebo plus pembrolizumab for advanced urothelial carcinoma: results from the randomized phase III ECHO-303/KEYNOTE-698 study.

Irfan Cicin, Elizabeth R Plimack, Howard Gurney, Raya Leibowitz, Boris Y Alekseev, Francis X Parnis, Avivit Peer, Andrea Necchi, Joaquim Bellmunt, Hiroyuki Nishiyama and 6 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIIComparative StudyMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC cancer, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03374488 (A Phase 3 Randomized, Double-Blind Clinical Study of Pembrolizumab + Epacadostat vs Pembrolizumab + Placebo as a Treatment for Recurrent or Progressive Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma in Patients Who Have Failed a First-Line Platinum-containing Chemotherapy Regimen for Advanced/Metastatic Disease), which is not on this map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03374488 phase3completednot on this map

A Phase 3 Randomized, Double-Blind Clinical Study of Pembrolizumab + Epacadostat vs Pembrolizumab + Placebo as a Treatment for Recurrent or Progressive Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma in Patients Who Have Failed a First-Line Platinum-containing Chemotherapy Regimen for Advanced/Metastatic Disease (KEYNOTE-698/ECHO-303)

TypeinterventionalSponsorIncyte CorporationRan2017 to 2020Enrolled84ConditionsUC (Urothelial Cancer)ArmsPembrolizumab, Epacadostat, Placebo
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Phase I Evaluation of Patients with Newly Diagnosed Glioblastoma Treated with Radiation, Nivolumab, and IDO1 Enzyme Inhibitor BMS-986205.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Stage-Dependent Changes in Kynurenine Pathway Enzyme Expression Suggest Immune-Related Involvement in Bladder Cancer Progression.International journal of urology : official journal of the Japanese Urological Association · 2026
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Irfan CicinDepartment of Medical Oncology, Trakya University, 22030, Edirne, Turkey. irfancicin@trakya.edu.tr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7584-3868
Elizabeth R PlimackFox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Howard GurneyMacquarie University, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Raya LeibowitzOncology Institute and Cancer Research Centre, Sheba Medical Centre Hospital, Tel Hashomer, Ramat Gan, Israel.
Boris Y AlekseevPA Hertsen Moscow Cancer Research Institute, Moscow, Russia.
Francis X ParnisAdelaide University and Adelaide Cancer Centre, Kurralta Park, SA, Australia.
Avivit PeerRambam Health Care Center, Haifa, Israel.
Andrea NecchiFondazione IRCCS, Istituto Nazionale Dei Tumori, Milan, Italy.
Joaquim BellmuntBeth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and PSMAR-IMIM Lab, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Hiroyuki NishiyamaUniversity of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan.
Jason ClarkIncyte Corporation, Wilmington, DE, USA.
Mihaela MunteanuIncyte Corporation, Wilmington, DE, USA.
Ritesh KatariaMerck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, USA.
Calvin JiaMerck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, USA.
Thomas Powles *Barts Health and the Royal Free NHS Trusts, Barts Cancer Institute, and Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.
Cora N Sternberg *Englander Institute for Precision Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIndoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase 1 (IDO1) levels correlate with poor outcomes in urothelial carcinoma (UC). IDO1 and programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) are often co-expressed. Epacadostat is a potent and highly selective inhibitor of IDO1. In a subgroup analysis of patients with advanced UC participating in a phase I/II study, epacadostat-pembrolizumab treatment produced an objective response rate (ORR) of 35%.

methodsECHO-303/KEYNOTE-698 was a double-blinded, randomized phase III study of adults with metastatic or unresectable locally advanced UC with recurrence or progression following first-line platinum-based chemotherapy. Participants were randomized to epacadostat 100 mg twice daily (BID) plus pembrolizumab or placebo plus pembrolizumab until completion of 35 pembrolizumab infusions, disease progression, or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint was investigator-assessed ORR per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1.

resultsTarget enrollment was 648 patients; enrollment was halted early based on efficacy results from the phase III ECHO-301/KEYNOTE-252 study in metastatic melanoma. Forty-two patients were randomized to each treatment arm. Median duration of follow-up was 62 days in each arm. The investigator-assessed ORR (unconfirmed) was 26.2% (95% CI 16.35-48.11) for epacadostat plus pembrolizumab and 11.9% (95% CI 4.67-29.50) for placebo plus pembrolizumab. Two complete responses were reported, both in the placebo-plus-pembrolizumab arm. Circulating kynurenine levels increased from C1D1 to C2D1 in the placebo-plus-pembrolizumab arm and numerically decreased in the epacadostat-plus-pembrolizumab arm. The safety profile of epacadostat plus pembrolizumab was similar to that of pembrolizumab monotherapy, although a numerically greater proportion of patients in the combination vs. control arm experienced treatment-related grade ≥ 3 adverse events (16.7% vs. 7.3%). One patient in each arm died due to cardiovascular events, which were not deemed drug-related. No new safety concerns were identified for either agent.

conclusionsEpacadostat plus pembrolizumab demonstrated anti-tumor activity and was generally tolerable as second-line treatment of patients with unresectable locally advanced or recurrent/progressive metastatic UC. Epacadostat 100 mg BID, when administered with pembrolizumab, did not normalize circulating kynurenine in most patients. Further study of combined IDO1/PD-L1 inhibition in this patient population, particularly with epacadostat doses that result in durable normalization of circulating kynurenine, may be warranted.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03374488. Registered 12/15/2017.

Indexed as

Antibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsSulfonamidesUrologic NeoplasmsUrotheliumAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCarcinoma, Transitional CellDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansIndoleamine-Pyrrole 2,3,-DioxygenaseMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedepacadostatIDO1 protein, humanIndoleamine-Pyrrole 2,3,-DioxygenaseOximespembrolizumabPlacebosSulfonamidesEpacadostatIDO1Immune checkpoint inhibitionPD-L1PembrolizumabRandomized controlled studyUrothelial carcinoma

Identifiers

PMID39054485
PMCPMC11270759

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.