Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39054429›Full record

ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2024

Prevalence of anxiety and depression and their associated risk factors throughout pregnancy and postpartum: a prospective cross-sectional descriptive multicentred study.

Marta Jimènez-Barragan, Gemma Falguera-Puig, Jorge Juan Curto-Garcia, Olga Monistrol, Engracia Coll-Navarro, Mercè Tarragó-Grima, Olga Ezquerro-Rodriguez, Anna Carmona Ruiz, Laura Codina-Capella, Xavier Urquizu and 1 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Marta Jimènez-BarraganUniversitat de Barcelona, Fundació Assistencial Mútua Terrassa, (Terrassa), Research Group on Sexual and Reproductive Healthcare (GRASSIR), (2021-sgr-01489), Barcelona, 08221, Spain. marta.jim@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8462-6630
Gemma Falguera-PuigAtenció a la Salut Sexual i Reproductiva Metropolitana Nord, Direcció d'Atenció Primària Metropolitana Nord, Institut Català de la Salut, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6066-3960
Jorge Juan Curto-GarciaAstraZeneca F, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0385-1439
Olga MonistrolFaculty of Nursing and Physiotherapy, University of Lleida, Iguada, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7605-8733
Engracia Coll-NavarroHead of Midwifery, Fundació Assistencial Mútua Terrassa, Terrassa, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8432-7075
Mercè Tarragó-GrimaMidwife, Sexual and Reproductive Health Clinic (ASSIR) CAP Rambla Terrassa, Mollet, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1948-1900
Olga Ezquerro-RodriguezMidwife, Sexual and Reproductive Health Clinic (ASSIR) CAP Rambla Terrassa, Mollet, Spain.
Anna Carmona RuizDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Fundació Sanitària Mollet, Mollet, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6597-0815
Laura Codina-CapellaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Fundació Assistencial Mútua Terrassa, Terrassa, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7885-2965
Xavier UrquizuDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Fundació Sanitària Mollet, Mollet, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3198-2097
Amparo Del Pino GutierrezDepartament de Salut Pública, Facultat de Medicina i Ciències de la Salut, Salut Mental i Materno-infantil, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2854-9850

Funding

BECA Mustela. Mustela Fondation FAME 2023Col·legi Oficial Infermeria de Barcelona (COIB) PR-642-2023Departament de Salut, Generalitat de Catalunya Grant No. PERIS SLT006/17/249
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo assess the prevalence of anxiety and depression and their associated risk factors throughout the pregnancy and postpartum process using a new screening for the early detection of mental health problems.

designA prospective cross-sectional descriptive multicentred study. Participants were consecutively enrolled at ≥ 12 weeks' gestation and followed at three different time points: at 12-14 weeks of pregnancy, at 29-30 weeks of pregnancy, and 4-6 weeks postpartum. All women completed a mental screening at week 12-14 of pregnancy consisting of two questions from the Generalised Anxiety Disorder Scale (GAD-2) and the two Whooley questions. If this screening was positive, the woman completed the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS).

settingSeven primary care centres coordinated by a Gynaecology and Obstetrics Department in the city of Terrassa (Barcelona) in northern Spain.

participantsPregnant women (N = 335, age 18-45 years), in their first trimester of pregnancy, and receiving prenatal care in the public health system between July 2018 and July 2020.

findingsThe most relevant factors associated with positive screening for antenatal depression or anxiety during pregnancy, that appear after the first trimester of pregnancy, are systematically repeated throughout the pregnancy, and are maintained in the postpartum period were: a history of previous depression, previous anxiety, abuse, and marital problems. In weeks 12-14 early risk factors for positive depression and anxiety screening and positive EPDS were: age, smoking, educational level, employment status, previous psychological/psychiatric history and treatment, suicide in the family environment, voluntary termination of pregnancy and current planned pregnancy, living with a partner and partner's income. In weeks 29-30 risk factors were: being a skilled worker, a history of previous depression or anxiety, and marital problems. In weeks 4-6 postpartum, risk factors were: age, a history of previous depression or anxiety or psychological/psychiatric treatment, type of treatment, having been mistreated, and marital problems.

conclusionsEarly screening for anxiety and depression in pregnancy may enable the creation of more effective healthcare pathways, by acting long before mental health problems in pregnant women worsen or by preventing their onset. Assessment of anxiety and depression symptoms before and after childbirth and emotional support needs to be incorporated into routine practice.

Indexed as

AnxietyDepressionPregnancy ComplicationsAdolescentAdultCross-Sectional StudiesDepression, PostpartumFemaleHumansMiddle AgedPostpartum PeriodPregnancyPrenatal CarePrevalenceProspective StudiesPsychiatric Status Rating ScalesAnxietyDepressionMidwiferyPregnancyRisk factorsScreening

Identifiers

PMID39054429
PMCPMC11270936

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.